Abstract:Objective: to assess the feasibility of a new stated preference approach, the multiple bounded dichotomous choice (MBDC), designed to generate value sets for preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life. Methods: MBDC and standard gamble (SG) tasks were completed to derive SF-6Dv2 value sets from a sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada. Participants were randomized between the two approaches: 6 health states were evaluated in SG and 11 health states in MBDC. Several models were used to estimate data in each approach, and the preferred models were chosen by using mean absolute error (MAE), logical consistency of parameters, and significance levels. Results of MBDC were compared with SG in terms of acceptability (self-reported difficulty and quality levels in answering, and completion time), consistency (monotonicity of model coefficients), accuracy (standard errors), dimensions coefficient magnitude, correlation between the value sets estimated, and the range of estimated values. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to assess value sets' consistency. Results: Out of 655 individuals who completed MBDC tasks and 828 who completed SG tasks, a total of 585 participants for MBDC and 714 for SG tasks were included for analysis. The preferred models for both approaches were GLS Tobit. No significant difference was observed in self-reported difficulties and qualities in answers among approaches, but MBDC had less excluded participants and was less prone to report difficulties in answering. Additionally, completion time in the MBDC group was significantly lower (99.80 vs 68.12 s). Most standard errors in the MBDC were lower than those in SG, and the number of non-significant parameters was also lower. The range of utility values generated by MBDC tended to be wider (-0.372 to 1) than those generated by the SG (-0.137 to 1) and the number of worse-than-dead states in MBDC (0.91%) was higher than for SG (0.08%). The Pain dimension was identified as the most significant, while the Vitality dimension showed the lowest significant decrement. Both approaches exhibited a tendency to overestimate severe health state values and underestimate better health state values. The correlation and ICC between the two value sets were 0.937 and 0.983, respectively. Conclusion: Based on empirical evidence, it can be inferred that the MBDC method is not only feasible but also holds the potential to generate meaningful and well-informed preference data from respondents. This approach can be used to derive a value set for preference-based instrument.

[Assessing Health State Utility Using the Short Form 36].

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Preference-based SF-6D Scores Derived from the SF-36 and SF-12 Have Different Discriminative Power in a Population Health Survey

Chinese utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument QLU-C10D

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

A Research on Measuring Health Status for Residents in Rural Areas

Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment

Health Utility and Its Affacting Factors for Patients with Psoriasis in China

Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

[Scaling the SF-36 in a Chinese Population].

Determining the Severity of Benign Urologic Health States in Men Using Utilities Measures

Health state utilities in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

United States Utility Algorithm for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multiattribute Utility Instrument Based on a Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument

Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?

Comparative Assessment of Different Health Utility Measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A novel approach for health state valuation: Multiple bounded dichotomous choice compared to the traditional standard gamble

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

A happiness approach to valuing health states for children

A Comparison between Methods of Assessing Utility Values in Rheumatoid Arthritis