Optimization of the Blade Trailing Edge Geometric Parameters for A Small Scale Orc Turbine

L. Zhang,W. L. Zhuge,J. Peng,S. J. Liu,Y. J. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/52/4/042016

2013-01-01

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering

Abstract:In general, the method proposed by Whitfield and Baines is adopted for the turbine preliminary design. In this design procedure for the turbine blade trailing edge geometry, two assumptions (ideal gas and zero discharge swirl) and two experience values (W-R and gamma) are used to get the three blade trailing edge geometric parameters: relative exit flow angle beta(6), the exit tip radius R-6t and hub radius R-6h for the purpose of maximizing the rotor total-to-static isentropic efficiency. The method above is established based on the experience and results of testing using air as working fluid, so it does not provide a mathematical optimal solution to instruct the optimization of geometry parameters and consider the real gas effects of the organic, working fluid which must be taken into consideration for the ORC turbine design procedure. In this paper, a new preliminary design and optimization method is established for the purpose of reducing the exit kinetic energy loss to improve the turbine efficiency eta(ts), and the blade trailing edge geometric parameters for a small scale ORC turbine with working fluid R123 are optimized based on this method. The mathematical optimal solution to minimize the exit kinetic energy is deduced, which can be used to design and optimize the exit shroud/hub radius and exit blade angle. And then, the influence of blade trailing edge geometric parameters on turbine efficiency eta(ts) are analysed and the optimal working ranges of these parameters for the equations are recommended in consideration of working fluid R123. This method is used to modify an existing ORC turbine exit kinetic energy loss from 11.7% to 7%, which indicates the effectiveness of the method. However, the internal passage loss increases from 7.9% to 9.4%, so the only way to consider the influence of geometric parameters on internal passage loss is to give the empirical ranges of these parameters, such as the recommended ranges that the value of gamma is at 0.3 to 0.4, and the value of tau is at 0.5 to 0.6.