Abstract:Purpose Given the serious question raised by the subprime of the 2008 global financial crisis over the rising practices of excessive rewarding of executives in the USA and European firms, the executive pay-performance nexus has emerged as a popular topic of debate in the contemporary corporate finance research. Conducted mostly on the Anglo-Saxon contexts, research outcomes have been inconclusive and dichotomous. Considering this backdrop, this study aims to investigate the endogenous relationship between executive compensation and risk taking in the context of the USA. Design/methodology/approach Using a large sample of non-financial firms from 2010 to 2020 based on panel data and two-stage least square regression. In this study, the riskier corporate decision is measured as book leverage and ratio of R&D expense to total assets. Chief executive officers' (CEO) experience and age are used as instrumental variables, and these are expected to influence compensation incentives and, hence, affect firm riskiness indirectly. Firm size, return on assets and CEO turnover are reported to affect compensation and corporate decisions, therefore, included as control variables. Given that higher executive compensation is related to riskier corporate decision in firms, this study incorporates total wealth (i.e. accumulated equity related compensation) as an additional proxy of compensation, and this selection is justifiable by the perfect contracting notion of the agency theory. Findings The results of this study show a significant positive and increasing nexus among compensation and riskier corporate decisions. Besides, the compensation level proxied through the percentage of each form of compensation in total compensation is very important as greater equity and greater salary diminishes risk taking. Practical implications The outcomes of this study have useful implications for firm stakeholders and policymakers. Originality/value The level of pay measured by the percentage of each type of compensation in total compensation is of utmost importance as it can increase or decrease risk taking in corporate decisions.

Nonmonetary Benefits, Quality of Life, and Executive Compensation

Location Matters: The Impact of Surrounding Environmental Condition on CEO Compensation

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Corporate Environmental Responsibilities and Executive Compensation: A Risk Management Perspective

Top Executives' Compensation, Industrial Competition, and Corporate Environmental Performance Evidence from China

Are Top Executives Rewarded for Environmental Performance? the Role of the Board of Directors in the Context of China

Environmental risk exposure and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity

Can Environmental Regulation Reduce Labor Costs and Improve Business Performance? Evidence From the Air Quality Index

The effect of CEO's compensation in driving corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

The Effect of Local Tournament Incentives on Firms' Performance, Risk-Taking Decisions, and Financial Reporting Decisions

Compensation peer effects of corporate social responsibility

An Empirical Study on Determinants of CEO's Compensation

Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings

CEO compensation, firm performance and operational characteristics

Executive compensation, risk and performance: evidence from the USA

Political Promotion, CEO Incentives, and the Relationship Between Pay and Performance

Executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: does a golden parachute matter?

From greed to good: how government regulations of executive compensation impact corporate ESG performance?

A Critical Review of Executive Compensation Policies Grounded in ESG Principles

Analysis of the Connection Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Fiscal Achievement

East, West, Home's Best: Do Local CEOs Behave Less Myopically?