Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with Lenstar LS900 and Tomey EM-3000

Qiong Zhang,ZHANG Shi-sheng,WU Yan-lin,Wei Du,Ling Wang,XU Jian-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2013.09.014
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the accuracy and consistency between Lenstar LS900 and Tomey EM-3000 in measurement of central corneal thickness. Methods One hundred and seventy-two patients( 188 eyes) with cataract were divided into four groups based on the axial length: group A( ≥28 mm),group B( 26 mm to 28 mm),group C( 24 mm to26 mm) and group D( < 24 mm). Central corneal thickness was measured by Lenstar LS900 and Tomey EM-3000 analyzer respectively,and the data were statistically analyzed. Results The mean central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900 was( 541. 51 ± 36. 41) μm,that measured by Tomey EM-3000 was( 536. 28 ± 37. 64) μm,and there were significant differences between them( P < 0. 01). Except for group D,there were significant differences between central corneal thickness measured by two methods in the other three groups( P < 0. 01). There was linear correlation between central corneal thickness measured by two methods( r = 0. 96,P < 0. 01). The 95% limits of agreement ranged between-13. 9 μm and 24. 2 μm,and 95. 7%( 180 /188) fell in the limits. Conclusion The central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900 is slightly larger than that measured by Tomey EM-3000,while there exists high correlation and good agreement between them,and both can be used in measurement of central corneal thickness.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?