Abstract:Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) is a powerful characterization technique to readily image and manipulate ferroelectrics domains. PFM gives insight into the strength of local piezoelectric coupling as well as polarization direction through PFM amplitude and phase, respectively. Converting measured arbitrary units to physical material parameters, however, remains a challenge. While much effort has been spent on quantifying the PFM amplitude signal, little attention has been given to the PFM phase and it is often arbitrarily adjusted to fit expectations or processed as recorded. This is problematic when investigating materials with unknown or potentially negative sign of the probed effective electrostrictive coefficient or strong frequency dispersion of electromechanical responses since assumptions about the phase cannot be reliably made. The PFM phase can, however, provide important information on the polarization orientation and the sign of the electrostrictive coefficient. Most notably, the orientation of the PFM hysteresis loop is determined by the PFM phase. Moreover, when presenting PFM data as a combined signal, the resulting response can be artificially lowered or asymmetric if the phase data has not been correctly processed. Here, we demonstrate a path to identify the phase offset required to extract correct meaning from PFM phase data. We explore different sources of phase offsets including the experimental setup, instrumental contributions, and data analysis. We discuss the physical working principles of PFM and develop a strategy to extract physical meaning from the PFM phase. The proposed procedures are verified on two materials with positive and negative piezoelectric coefficients.

Role of Measurement Voltage on Hysteresis Loop Shape in Piezoresponse Force Microscopy

A Hysteresis Model for Ferroelectric Ceramics with Mechanism for Minor Loops

Stress induced polarization switching and coupled hysteretic dynamics in ferroelectric materials

Electrostatic effect on off-field ferroelectric hysteresis loop in piezoresponse force microscopy

Electrostatic contribution to hysteresis loop in piezoresponse force microscopy

Variation of contact resonance frequency during domain switching in PFM measurements for ferroelectric materials

Defining ferroelectric characteristics with reversible piezoresponse: PUND switching spectroscopy PFM characterization

Differentiating Ferroelectric and Nonferroelectric Electromechanical Effects with Scanning Probe Microscopy.

Electromechanical and ferroelectric hysteresis in dense and porous PZT-type piezoceramics

Piezoresponse phase as variable in electromechanical characterization

The origin of hysteresis in resistive switching in magnetite is Joule heating

Research on hysteresis of piezoelectric actuator

Non-piezoelectric effects in piezoresponse force microscopy

Modeling and Compensation for Dynamic Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators Based on Lissajous Curve

Nanoscale Ferroelectric Characterization with Heterodyne Megasonic Piezoresponse Force Microscopy

Revisiting contrast mechanism of lateral piezoresponse force microscopy

Factors Influencing Ferroelectric Switching Behavior in Perovskite Nanofibers

Creep and Hysteresis Compensation for Nanomanipulation Using Atomic Force Microscope

Piezoresponse Force Spectroscopy of Ferroelectric Materials

Determination of Imprint Effects in Ferroelectrics from the Quantified Phase and Amplitude Response

In-situ Piezoresponse Force Microscopy Cantilever Mode Shape Profiling