Abstract:This paper compares tracking performances of the inverse hysteresis model-based feedforward compensator and the feedback-feedforward combined controller for the time-varying hysteresis nonlinearity of a piezoelectric-stack-actuator-driven (PSA-driven) system. Three different inverse hysteresis models, including Bouc-Wen, polynomial, and Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI), are adopted to design feedforward compensator for the PSA-driven compliant system. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) scheme is employed to estimate model parameters of the Bouc-Wen and PI hysteresis models, respectively, whereas the least-mean-square-error based criterion is utilized in identifying the polynomial-based hysteresis model. Although solely feedforward compensation approach seems workable for systems with rate-independent hysteresis or slow tracking trajectories, large modeling errors are inevitable when fast trajectory or rate-dependent hysteresis is facing. To improve tracking performances, conventional PID control is augmented to the feedforward controllers. The resultant scheme is denoted as the feedback-feedforward combined control. To compare control performances of the solely feedforward and feedback-feedforward combined scheme, a number of experiments focusing on sinusoidal trajectories with different frequency have been implemented on the PSA-driven stage system. The results indicate that significant performance improvement can be achieved provided PID control is augmented to the solely feedforward approach. When different hysteresis models are of concerned, PI hysteresis model performs better in either feedforward or combined cases.

Creep and Hysteresis Compensation for Nanomanipulation Using Atomic Force Microscope

Comprehensive compensation of dynamic hysteresis and creep for piezoelectric actuator

Automatic Drift Compensation Using Phase Correlation Method for Nanomanipulation

Modeling and Compensation for Dynamic Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators Based on Lissajous Curve

Atomic Force Microscope-Based Nanomanipulation with Drift Compensation

Feedback-Assisted Feedforward Hysteresis Compensation: A Unified Approach and Applications to Piezoactuated Nanopositioners

Modeling and Simo Controlling of Piezoceramic Hysteresis

A new hysteresis modeling and optimization for piezoelectric actuators based on asymmetric Prandtl-Ishlinskii model

Frequency-shaped sliding mode control of piezoelectric nano-stages with hysteresis estimation

Nanomanipulation Using Atomic Force Microscope with Drift Compensation.

Model-Free Adaptive Nonlinearity and Hysteresis Compensation Control Strategy with Application to Nano-Precision Piezoelectric Stage

Adaptive Robust Precision Motion Control of a Piezoelectric Positioning Stage

Hysteresis Compensation of a Piezoelectric-Stack-actuator-driven (Psa-Driven) System Using Inversion-Based Models and Feedback Control

Hysteresis Effect Suppression: Replacing Modeling with Linear and Nonlinear Methods Combination

Modeling and Compensation of Dynamic Hysteresis with Force-Voltage Coupling for Piezoelectric Actuators

Modeling and Control of Piezoelectric Hysteresis: A Polynomial-Based Fractional Order Disturbance Compensation Approach

Automated Nanomanipulation with Afm by Using L-1 Adaptive Controller

Precision Control of A Piezo-Actuate System Using Fuzzy Sliding-Mode Control with Feedforward Predictor-Based Compensation

Hybrid hysteresis modeling and inverse model compensation of piezoelectric actuators

Hysteresis Modeling and Precision Trajectory Control for A New Mfc Micromanipulator

Adaptive Backstepping Time Delay Control for Precision Positioning Stage with Unknown Hysteresis