Abstract:Ferroelectric materials have remained one of the major focal points of condensed matter physics and materials science for over 50 years. In the last 20 years, the development of voltage-modulated scanning probe microscopy techniques, exemplified by Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and associated time- and voltage spectroscopies, opened a pathway to explore these materials on a single-digit nanometer level. Consequently, domain structures and walls and polarization dynamics can now be imaged in real space. More generally, PFM has allowed studying electromechanical coupling in a broad variety of materials ranging from ionics to biological systems. It can also be anticipated that the recent Nobel prize [“The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2016,” http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2016/ (Nobel Media, 2016)] in molecular electromechanical machines will result in rapid growth in interest in PFM as a method to probe their behavior on single device and device assembly levels. However, the broad introduction of PFM also resulted in a growing number of reports on the nearly ubiquitous presence of ferroelectric-like phenomena including remnant polar states and electromechanical hysteresis loops in materials which are non-ferroelectric in the bulk or in cases where size effects are expected to suppress ferroelectricity. While in certain cases plausible physical mechanisms can be suggested, there is remarkable similarity in observed behaviors, irrespective of the materials system. In this review, we summarize the basic principles of PFM, briefly discuss the features of ferroelectric surfaces salient to PFM imaging and spectroscopy, and summarize existing reports on ferroelectric-like responses in non-classical ferroelectric materials. We further discuss possible mechanisms behind observed behaviors and possible experimental strategies for their identification.

Electrostatic effect on off-field ferroelectric hysteresis loop in piezoresponse force microscopy

Electrostatic contribution to hysteresis loop in piezoresponse force microscopy

Non-piezoelectric effects in piezoresponse force microscopy

Force-Electric Coupling of Nanoscale Ferroelectric Domains Based on Piezoelectric Force Microscopy (PFM)

Role of Measurement Voltage on Hysteresis Loop Shape in Piezoresponse Force Microscopy

Differentiating Ferroelectric and Nonferroelectric Electromechanical Effects with Scanning Probe Microscopy.

Revisiting contrast mechanism of lateral piezoresponse force microscopy

Decoupling competing electromechanical mechanisms in dynamic atomic force microscopy

Piezoresponse Force Spectroscopy of Ferroelectric Materials

Variation of contact resonance frequency during domain switching in PFM measurements for ferroelectric materials

Piezoresponse phase as variable in electromechanical characterization

More Ferroelectrics Discovered by Switching Spectroscopy Piezoresponse Force Microscopy?

A Phase-Field Simulation-Based Approach to Determine Flexoelectric Coefficients from Hysteresis Loop of Ferroelectrics

Defining ferroelectric characteristics with reversible piezoresponse: PUND switching spectroscopy PFM characterization

Nanoscale Ferroelectric Characterization with Heterodyne Megasonic Piezoresponse Force Microscopy

Influence of the inhomogeneous field at the tip on quantitative piezoresponse force microscopy

Determination of Imprint Effects in Ferroelectrics from the Quantified Phase and Amplitude Response

Switching Spectroscopic Measurement Of Surface Potentials On Ferroelectric Surfaces Via An Open-Loop Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy Method

Factors Influencing Ferroelectric Switching Behavior in Perovskite Nanofibers

Ferroelectric-like Hysteresis Loops Induced by Chemical Reaction and Flexoelectricity in Electrochemical Strain Microscopy Measurements

Ferroelectric or non-ferroelectric: Why so many materials exhibit “ferroelectricity” on the nanoscale