Automated Monitoring of Clinical Practice Guideline Adherence Using FHIR and OMOP: A Multi-Center Study in Intensive Care Units
Gregor Lichtner,Fridtjof Schiefenhoevel,Bora Gashi,Ingrid Martin,Carlo Jurth,Lisa Vasiljewa,Dana Kleimeier,Sebastian Gibb,Markus Heim,Juergen Brugger,Johannes Lohr,Martin Feig,Saya Speidel,Thomas Bienert,Igor Abramovich,Mathias Kaspar,Anja Sindel,Laurenz Mehringer,Ludwig Christian Hinske,Philipp Simon,Axel R Heller,Peter Kranke,Patrick Meybohm,Felix Balzer,Claudia Spies,Gerhard Schneider,Klaus Hahnenkamp,Dagmar Waltemath,Martin Boeker,Falk von Dincklage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.02.24319597
2025-01-03
Abstract:Background
Clinical practice guidelines are important tools for clinical decision support, but monitoring guideline adherence manually is highly resource-intensive. Therefore, we developed an automated system for evaluating guideline adherence based on computer-interpretable representations of guidelines. We implemented the system across multiple university hospitals and assessed its validity and performance by comparing its guideline adherence evaluations to those conducted by medical professionals.
Methods
We selected six representative clinical guideline recommendations from across 41 intensive care guidelines and translated these text-based recommendations into a computer-interpretable, Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based format using an iterative consensus approach. Clinical data from five university hospitals were transformed into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model. A decision support system was developed to interpret FHIR-encoded recommendations and apply them to OMOP-formatted patient data. We evaluated the system retrospectively on intensive care data covering 3.5 years and validated its performance by comparing system-generated decisions with human decisions in three hospitals. We created and iteratively refined a user interface for individual and ward-level adherence visualization.
Findings
We expert-reviewed more than 18,000 patient days to assess the applicability of and adherence to the recommendations. The system demonstrated 97.0% accuracy in identifying guideline applicability and adherence, with significantly higher accuracy than human reviewers (accuracy 86.6%, p<0.001, McNemar's Test). The automated system processed more than 2000 patient days per second for a total of 2,200,000 patient days across 82,000 intensive care episodes, compared to humans' two patient days per minute.
Interpretation
We demonstrate that an automated adherence monitoring system outperforms human reviewers in both accuracy and time efficiency. Using FHIR-encoded recommendations enables flexibility and scalability across hospitals with different data infrastructures. Future work should focus on integrating unstructured patient data and expanding the range of encoded recommendations.
Funding
Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany.