Abstract:Background: Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that poses a substantial burden on individuals and the health care system. Despite published national guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, considerable care gaps exist. Suboptimal adherence to asthma diagnosis and management guidelines contributes to poor patient outcomes. The integration of electronic tools (eTools) into electronic medical records (EMRs) represents a knowledge translation opportunity to support best practices. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine how best to integrate evidence-based asthma eTools into primary care EMRs across Ontario and Canada to improve adherence to guidelines as well as measure and monitor performance. Methods: In total, 2 focus groups comprising physicians and allied health professionals who were considered experts in primary care, asthma, and EMRs were convened. One focus group also included a patient participant. Focus groups used a semistructured discussion-based format to consider the optimal methods for integrating asthma eTools into EMRs. Discussions were held on the web via Microsoft Teams (Microsoft Corp). The first focus group discussed integrating asthma indicators into EMRs using eTools, and participants completed a questionnaire evaluating the clarity, relevance, and feasibility of collecting asthma performance indicator data at the point of care. The second focus group addressed how to incorporate eTools for asthma into a primary care setting and included a questionnaire evaluating the perceived utility of various eTools. Focus group discussions were recorded and analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis. The responses to focus group questionnaires were assessed using descriptive quantitative analysis. Results: Qualitative analysis of the 2 focus group discussions revealed 7 key themes: designing outcome-oriented tools, gaining stakeholder trust, facilitating open lines of communication, prioritizing the end user, striving for efficiency, ensuring adaptability, and developing within existing workflows. In addition, 24 asthma indicators were rated according to clarity, relevance, feasibility, and overall usefulness. In total, 5 asthma performance indicators were identified as the most relevant. These included smoking cessation support, monitoring using objective measures, the number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, assessment of asthma control, and presence of an asthma action plan. The eTool questionnaire responses revealed that the Asthma Action Plan Wizard and Electronic Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire were perceived to be the most useful in primary care. Conclusions: Primary care physicians, allied health professionals, and patients consider that eTools for asthma care present a unique opportunity to improve adherence to best-practice guidelines in primary care and collect performance indicators. The strategies and themes identified in this study can be leveraged to overcome barriers associated with asthma eTool integration into primary care EMRs. The most beneficial indicators and eTools, along with the key themes identified, will guide future asthma eTool implementation.

A model for adapting clinical guidelines for electronic implementation in primary care

Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care

Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-study Approach

Cognitive psychological studies of representation and use of clinical practice guidelines

Integrating Population Health Concepts, Clinical Guidelines, and Ambulatory Medical Systems To Improve Diabetes Care

Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Implement Asthma Management Guidelines in Pediatric Primary Care (Preprint)

Guidelines or mindlines? - implementing a new CKD guideline in German primary care

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model

A critical appraisal of guidelines for electronic communication between patients and clinicians: the need to modernize current recommendations

Redesigning Diabetes Care for Treatment Inertia: A Population Health Model.

Transforming evidence-based clinical guidelines into implementable clinical decision support services: the CAREPATH study for multimorbidity management

User-Centered Design of a Clinical Tool for Shared Decision-making About Diet in Primary Care

Implementing an Opt-in eConsult Program at Seven Academic Medical Centers: a Qualitative Analysis of Primary Care Provider Experiences

Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries

Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility

Effective web-based clinical practice guidelines resources: recommendations from a mixed methods usability study

IDE 4 ICDS: A human-centric and model-driven proposal to improve the digitization of clinical practice guideline

Integrating User Preferences for Asthma Tools and Clinical Guidelines Into Primary Care Electronic Medical Records: Mixed Methods Study

Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: A review

Developing evidence-based practice guidelines and pathways: the experience at the local hospital level

Conventional and living guideline for schizophrenia: barriers and facilitating factors in guideline implementation