Abstract:In this work we propose a comprehensive framework based on first-order logic (FOL) for mitigating (identifying and addressing) interactions between multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) applied to a multi-morbid patient while also considering patient preferences related to the prescribed treatment. With this framework we respond to two fundamental challenges associated with clinical decision support: (1) concurrent application of multiple CPGs and (2) incorporation of patient preferences into the decision making process. We significantly expand our earlier research by (1) proposing a revised and improved mitigation-oriented representation of CPGs and secondary medical knowledge for addressing adverse interactions and incorporating patient preferences and (2) introducing a new mitigation algorithm. Specifically, actionable graphs representing CPGs allow for parallel and temporal activities (decisions and actions). Revision operators representing secondary medical knowledge support temporal interactions and complex revisions across multiple actionable graphs. The mitigation algorithm uses the actionable graphs, revision operators and available (and possibly incomplete) patient information represented in FOL. It relies on a depth-first search strategy to find a valid sequence of revisions and uses theorem proving and model finding techniques to identify applicable revision operators and to establish a management scenario for a given patient if one exists. The management scenario defines a safe (interaction-free) and preferred set of activities together with possible patient states. We illustrate the use of our framework with a clinical case study describing two patients who suffer from chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, and who are managed according to CPGs for these diseases. While in this paper we are primarily concerned with the methodological aspects of mitigation, we also briefly discuss a high-level proof of concept implementation of the proposed framework in the form of a clinical decision support system (CDSS). The proposed mitigation CDSS "insulates" clinicians from the complexities of the FOL representations and provides semantically meaningful summaries of mitigation results. Ultimately we plan to implement the mitigation CDSS within our MET (Mobile Emergency Triage) decision support environment.

Towards automated generation and execution of clinical guidelines: Engine design and implementation through the ICU Modified Schofield use case

A modular approach for representing and executing clinical guidelines

Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: A review

GASTON: an architecture for the acquisition and execution of clinical guideline-application tasks

Supporting a distributed execution of clinical guidelines

Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine

System for Context-Specific Visualization of Clinical Practice Guidelines (GuLiNav): Concept and Software Implementation

Ontology-driven execution of clinical guidelines

Visual representation of digital clinical guideline]

Supporting the distributed execution of clinical guidelines by multiple agents

A model for adapting clinical guidelines for electronic implementation in primary care

Comprehensive mitigation framework for concurrent application of multiple clinical practice guidelines

Model-Driven Design of Clinical Guidance Systems

Development and Implementation of Clinical Decision Algorithms for Oncology

A Hybrid Execution Environment for Computer-Interpretable Guidelines in PROforma

Translating ethical and quality principles for the effective, safe and fair development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare

Modelling clinical narrative as computable knowledge: The NICE computable implementation guidance project

How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review

Pattern-Based Statechart Modeling Approach for Medical Best Practice Guidelines - A Case Study

Transforming Medical Best Practice Guidelines to Executable and Verifiable Statechart Models

Formal Methods, Artificial Intelligence, Big-Data Analytics, and Knowledge Engineering in Medical Care to Reduce Disease Burden and Health Disparities