Abstract:Objective: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide explicit recommendations for clinical practice in order to optimize results, minimize risks and promote cost-effective practice. The quality of many CPGs was modest and that heterogeneity was existed among different guidelines. (AGREE) instrument updated it is an instrument. This systematic analysis aimed to assess the CPGs for the prevention and management of hypertension by AGREE II instrument that provides criteria to assess the quality of CPGs. Design and method: To identify CPGs of hypertension, a systematic search of the following relevant literature databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), CNKI, Wan fang Data, VIP, and CBM was performed in the period from inception to Dec. 2015 and AGREE II instrument that consisting of six domains covering 23 key items was used to assess the quality of the included guidelines. Results: Eventually 41 guidelines met our inclusion criteria (10 CPGs in Chinese and 31 CPGs in English). The data of overall recommendation were presented as follow: strongly recommended (15%), recommended(29%), weakly recommended (51%), not recommended(5%). The scores of mean ± sd for all domains was: “Scope and Purpose” (58.65% ± 12.67%), “Stakeholder Involvement” (48.07% ± 11.41%), “Rigour of Development” (27.31% ± 12.29%), “Clarity of Presentation” (53.89% ± 11.09%, “Applicability” (40.10% ± 13.33%), “Editorial Independence” (38.75% ± 16.43%). All differences were statistically insignificant for all domains (P > 0.05) according to publication time. CPGs using evidenced-based method had higher quality than non-evidence-based for all domains, the differences were statistically insignificant with the exception of “Stakeholder Involvement” (P = 0.14) and “Clarity of Presentation” (P = 0.61). All domain scores appeared slightly higher for CPGs developed by association and society versus those by individual. The difference results were statistically insignificant for all domains (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Some hypertension guidelines have flawed methodological quality. A more systematic approach in the development of these guidelines is recommended. The AGREE II instrument can be a useful tool to improve the quality of guidelines and should be served as a compulsory checklist for CPGs.

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

Quality problems in clinical practice guidelines and guideline appraisal studies: Should we tolerate or eradicate?

[PP.26.09] QUALITY OF CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION, A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS USING THE AGREE II INSTRUMENT

Assessing the Quality of Global Clinical Practice Guidelines on Gout Using AGREE II Instrument.

Are paediatric clinical practice guidelines trustworthy?

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument

Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Appraising the quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine using AGREE II instrument: A systematic review

Quality Assessment of Clinical Guidelines in China: 1993 - 2010.

Quality Assessment of Cancer Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for infectious diseases in China.

Quality Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus Published in China Between 2007 and 2017 Using the AGREE II Instrument.

Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review

Evaluation Of The Quality Of Guidelines For Myasthenia Gravis With The Agree Ii Instrument

Clinical Epidemiology in China Series. Paper 4: the Reporting and Methodological Quality of Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Published Between 2014 and 2018: A Systematic Review.

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Systematic Assessment.

Assessment of the quality of recommendations from 161 clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument shows there is room for improvement

An Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Attitude Should We Have Towards the Guidelines?

Using the RIGHT statement to evaluate the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine

Reproducibility of the AGREE II Tool for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing GI Endoscopy