Abstract:BACKGROUND: Pediatric clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can provide systematically developed clinical recommendations to guide pediatric clinicians and patients making decisions. This study aims to assess the methodological and reporting quality of pediatric CPGs.METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE from 1 January 1990 to 2 April 2020 to identify pediatric CPGs published in the ten highest-impact pediatric journals and four highest-impact general medical journals. Two researchers evaluated the methodological and reporting quality of pediatric CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Health care (RIGHT) checklist. We calculated the mean AGREE II scores and compliance to RIGHT overall, and for each domain of the respective tools. We compared the methodological and reporting quality by different time periods and calculated the correlation between the AGREE II score and compliance to RIGHT.RESULTS: A total of 159 pediatric CPGs were identified. The mean (± standard deviation) scores for the six domains of the AGREE II instrument were as follows: scope and purpose 74.5%±14.2%, stakeholder involvement 42.7%±16.2%, rigour of development 18.7%±14.2%, clarity of presentation 56.5%±17.0%, applicability 8.9%±12.7% and editorial independence 25.2%±34.6%. The overall assessment score was 37.8%±12.4%. The mean compliance to RIGHT items in the seven domains of the checklist were: basic information 73.6%±14.9%, background 67.1%±16.4%, evidence 32.7%±27.2%, recommendations 32.4%±22.5%, review and quality assurance 22.9%±40.4%, funding and declaration and management of interests 24.1%±36.3%, and other information 45.3%±30.1%. The overall reporting rate for RIGHT was 46.4%±16.6%. Both the AGREE II scores and RIGHT reporting rates increased over time. We found a high positive correlation between AGREE II scores and RIGHT reporting compliance (r=0.645, P<0.001).DISCUSSION: The methodological and reporting quality of pediatric CPGs have improved over time, but remain still suboptimal and needs to be further improved. An international database of pediatric guidelines is urgently needed to identify and promote high-quality guidelines and guide clinical practice in pediatrics.

Quality evaluation of French guidelines in primary care infectious disease: An AGREE II assessment

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

A critical appraisal of acute sore throat guidelines using the AGREE II instrument: a scoping review

The quality of four psychology practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II

A critical review of recent clinical practice guidelines for pediatric urinary tract infection

Quality problems in clinical practice guidelines and guideline appraisal studies: Should we tolerate or eradicate?

An Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Attitude Should We Have Towards the Guidelines?

Assessment of the quality of recommendations from 161 clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument shows there is room for improvement

Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection and systematic analysis of the level of evidence for recommendations

[Adequate prescription of antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections in hospital: identifying and correcting non-observance of guidelines]

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument

Quality Assessment of Guidelines for the Management of Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Guidelines in Low and Middle Income Countries Paper 3: Appraisal of Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II: improvement needed for rigor, applicability, and editorial independence

Compliance with antibiotic therapy guidelines in french paediatric intensive care units: a multicentre observational study

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Systematic Assessment.

Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review

A systematic critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines of antithrombotic agents in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the AGREE II tool

Evidence‐basing for quality improvement; bringing clinical practice guidelines closer to their promise of improving care practices

Clinical guidelines of UTIs in children: quality appraisal with AGREE II and recommendations analysis

Reproducibility of the AGREE II Tool for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing GI Endoscopy