Abstract:Accumulation of electrostatic charges in gas–solid fluidized beds can lead to particle adhesions, electrostatic discharges, wall sheeting and even explosion. Therefore, it is of vital importance to reduce the electrostatic level in industrial fluidized beds. Adding chemical static agents was reported as one of the most promising ways to control fluidized bed electrostatic potentials. In this study, the electrostatic potential distributions were measured in a three-dimensional column gas–solid fluidized bed with the LLDPE particles for fluidization and the introduction of chemical static agents. Seven charge inducing agents including TiO2, Al2O3, MgO, H2O, C2H5OH, ZnO, and Fe2O3 were employed to investigate their influence on electrostatic potentials distribution respectively. Additionally, Al(Et)3, which is normally used as the cocatalyst for olefin polymerization, was also studied for comparison. It was found that the adding of negative charge inducing agent such as TiO2 made the positive electrostatic potentials shift to higher values and the negative electrostatic potentials shift to lower values. The injection of positive charge inducing agent such as Al2O3 and MgO caused the positive electrostatic potentials dropping to lower values and the negative electrostatic potentials shifting to the values near zero at low injection amount. Affecting mechanism of charge inducing agents was discussed based on the experimental results and the electronegativity of corresponding compounds. It was found that the electronegativity (χi) of the metal ion played an important role in determining the charge polarity on the LLDPE particles and the change in the electrostatic potentials after contact and separation with the charge inducing agent particles.

Prediction of Melt Residual in Batch Type Gas Injection Foaming Process

Foam Stability in Gas Injection Foaming Process

Effect on Residual Wall Thickness of Parts with Floating Core Injection of Water-Assisted Injection Molding

A Volatile Spray Zone Model and Experimentation in a Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed with Liquid Injection

Identification and Prediction of Injection Bubble Shape in MLPS Colloidal Suspension

Electrostatic Potentials in Gas–solid Fluidized Beds Influenced by the Injection of Charge Inducing Agents

Dynamic Modelling of Fluidisation in Gas-Solid Bubbling Fluidised Beds

Effect of Gas Chamber Volume and Number of Orifices on Pore Size in Gas Injection Foaming Process

Factors Influencing Foam Height in Gas Injection Process for Aluminum Foams

The Stability of Aluminum Foams at Accumulation and Condensation Stages in Gas Injection Foaming Process

Bubble Formation at a Submerged Orifice for Aluminum Foams Produced by Gas Injection Method

Effect of Ca on Particulate Dispersion and Foam Stability in Gas Injection Foaming Process

Effect of Orifice Geometry on Bubble Formation in Melt Gas Injection to Prepare Aluminum Foams

Melt Temperature Profile Prediction for Thermoplastic Injection Molding

In-line measurement and modeling of temperature, pressure, and blowing agent dependent viscosity of polymer melts

Effect of Cohesive Particle Addition on Bubbling Characteristics of Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed: Meso-scale Mechanism

Effect of Orifice Diameter on Bubble Generation Process in Melt Gas Injection to Prepare Aluminum Foams

Study on the definition, mechanism and controllability of secondary bubbles based on the bubble nucleation model in injection foaming polypropylene

Effects of Injection Molding Process Parameters on the Chemical Foaming Behavior of Polypropylene and Polystyrene

Numerical simulation of polymethyl‐methacrylate supercritical fluid foaming process: Bubble growth dynamics

Study on an Aluminum Foam by Gas Injection Foaming