Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the wear, fracture strength, and mode of failure of various brands of 3D‐printed resin denture teeth with prefabricated acrylic resin. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the different modes of failure exhibited by these teeth. Materials and Methods The study utilized 90 3D‐printed and 30 prefabricated, 3D‐printed resin teeth from three brands: L = Optiprint Lumina, A = ASIGA DentaTooth, P = Power resins, along with prefabricated acrylic teeth from M = Major Super Lux. Each of the 30 samples per main group was divided into two subgroups: The first subgroup samples (M1, A1, L1, P1) were subjected to thermal cycling and mechanical loading; M2, A2, L2, and P2 were not aged and tested directly. A scan of a prefabricated acrylic tooth was taken using an intraoral scanner, and then the STL file was printed using an Asiga 3Dprinter. The specimens underwent aging to simulate 5 years of clinical use with 10,000 thermal cycles and 1,200,000 dynamic load cycles on a chewing simulator. Surface roughness parameters (Rz, Ra, Rq) were measured using a 3D Optical Profilometer, fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine, and SEM analysis was performed to observe failure modes. Statistical analysis using T‐test, one‐way analysis, and two‐way analysis processed by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0 (SPSS: Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was done with a level of significance set at <0.05. Results The results showed that the difference in surface roughness parameters (Rz, Ra, Rq) before and after aging for Group M, Group A, Group L, and Group P was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Two‐way ANOVA for wear resistance between aging and groups on dependent variable Rz (p = 0.002), Ra (p = 0.001), Rq (p = 0.001) were significant. Multiple comparisons for surface roughness parameters showed Group A and Group L were lower than Group P and Group M (p < 0.05). For fracture strength, One‐way ANOVA showed a significant difference between groups for fracture strength either without or after the aging procedure (p 0.05). After the aging procedure fracture strength for Group M was higher than Group A, Group L, and Group P (p < 0.05). Conclusion 3D‐printed resin teeth showed a greater and comparable wear resistance to prefabricated acrylic teeth. Fracture strength was comparable between prefabricated acrylic teeth and 3D‐printed resin (Asiga and Lumina) before aging, but after aging 3D‐printed resin teeth showed less fracture strength.

Fracture resistance, marginal and internal adaptation of innovative 3D‐printed graded structure crown using a 3D jet printing technology

Accuracy and Margin Quality of Advanced 3D-Printed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.

Effect of build orientation on the fracture resistance and marginal quality of 3D-printed anatomic provisional crowns: An in-vitro study

The Fracture Resistance of Additively Manufactured Monolithic Zirconia vs. Bi-Layered Alumina Toughened Zirconia Crowns When Cemented to Zirconia Abutments. Evaluating the Potential of 3D Printing of Ceramic Crowns: An In Vitro Study

Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses

Effects of 3D-Printing Technology and Cement Type on the Fracture Resistance of Permanent Resin Crowns for Primary Teeth

Evaluation of fracture resistance and marginal fit of implant-supported interim crowns fabricated by conventional, additive and subtractive methods

Influence of build direction, post-polymerization time, and aging on the fracture resistance and marginal and internal discrepancies of three-dimensional printed provisional crowns

In Vitro Fracture and Fatigue Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Stereolithography

Fit comparison of interim crowns manufactured with open and proprietary 3D printing modes versus milling technology: An in vitro study

Fracture strength test of digitally produced ceramic-filled and unfilled dental resin restorations via 3d printing: An in vitro study

In Vitro Assessment of a New Block Design for Implant Crowns with Functional Gradient Fabricated with Resin Composite and Zirconia Insert

The effect of two preparation designs on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of two types of ceramic crowns using CAD/CAM technology (In vitro study)

EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND FIT ACCURACY OF THREE TYPES OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED CROWNS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY

Comparison of Fracture Strength of Milled and 3D-Printed Crown Materials According to Occlusal Thickness

Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of a single crown fabricated based on a three-dimensional printed model

Accuracy of Zirconia Crowns Manufactured by Stereolithography with an Occlusal Full-Supporting Structure: an in Vitro Study.

Effect of abutment design on fracture resistance of resin-matrix ceramic crowns for dental implant restoration: an in vitro study

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Internal Adaptations of Crowns Cast from Resin Patterns Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer- Assisted Manufacturing Technologies

3D-printed strong hybrid materials with low shrinkage for dental restoration

Mechanical properties of 3D‐printed resin denture teeth: An in vitro study