Practical Retrace Error Correction in Non-Null Aspheric Testing: A Comparison
Tu Shi,Dong Liu,Yuhao Zhou,Tianliang Yan,Yongying Yang,Lei Zhang,Jian Bai,Yibing Shen,Liang Miao,Wei Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.09.034
IF: 2.4
2016-01-01
Optics Communications
Abstract:In non-null aspheric testing, retrace error forms the primary error source, making it hard to recognize the desired figure error from the aliasing interferograms. Careful retrace error correction is a must bearing on the testing results. Performance of three commonly employed methods in practical, i.e. the GDI (geometrical deviation based on interferometry) method, the TRW (theoretical reference wavefront) method and the ROR (reverse optimization reconstruction) method, are compared with numerical simulations and experiments. Dynamic range of these methods are sought out and the application is recommended. It is proposed that with aspherical reference wavefront, dynamic range can be further enlarged. Results show that the dynamic range of the GDI method is small while that of the TRW method can be enlarged with aspherical reference wavefront, and the ROR method achieves the largest dynamic range with highest accuracy. It is recommended that the GDI and TRW methods be applied to apertures with small figure error and small asphericity, and the ROR method for commercial and research applications calling for high accuracy and large dynamic range.