Abstract:This article argues that a single simple interpretative framework explains a great deal about China's reform process. This framework, which I label the monopoly industry framework, can account for many of the most important observed facts in China's industry and financial development over the past decade. In some respects it may be considered a superior alternative to the centralization/decentralization paradigm that has dominated much of the writing about the Chinese reform process. The basic argument is as follows. Chinese economic policy since 1949 has been founded on the government's monopoly control of industry and the price system, which was used to pump resources into government industrialization programs. Economic reforms since 1978 have substantially weakened the government's monopoly, shrinking government fiscal resources while stimulating growth of the nonstate sector. This process has had beneficial economic effects but at the same time, because no new fiscal system has been created to replace industrial monopolies, has also created serious problems. The first selection of this article puts state monopoly control over industry and prices in the context of overall development strategy in the Chinese command economy; it describes three implications of the price structure and development strategy of command economies which have received inadequate attention. The second section briefly describes changes in the role of the government budget since 1978, and shows that these changes are closely linked to changes in the state's monopoly over industry; I hypothesize that changes in the state's monopoly can explain the changes in the role of the budget.

The Analysis of Social Welfare for the Private Capital into the Monopoly Industry

An Analysis on the Reform of the State-owned Monopoly Enterprises Based on the Duopoly Model

Studying The Reform Of Income And Distribution System of Monopoly Industries In Chinese Transitional Economy

Strategy of Private Investors Introduction to State-owned Monopolistic Enterprises andAchievement of Social Welfare Maximization

Comparative Study on the Reform Methods of Monopoly Industries in China

An Explanation on the Anti-monopoly with the View of Political Economy

Game Analysis of the Revolution of China's Natural Monopolistic Industries——Based on the Perspective of Interest Group

Study on Effect of Statutory Industrial Monopoly in China——Empirical Study from Welfare Loss and Welfare Distribution

Welfare Analysis Base on Price-Cap Regulation on Successive Monopolistic Upstream and Downstream Firms

An Empirical Study on Administrative Monopoly Welfare Los ess of China′s Banking Industr y in Transition Period

Study on the Entry Game and Evaluation of Regulation Performance in a Monopoly Industry

An Investigation into the Dynamic Differences of Wages between Industries

Upstream Market Monopoly,Asymmetric Competition and Social Welfare:On the Nature of the Large and Medium SOEs' Profit

Institution Environment,Incentive Structure and Income Regulation for Monopoly Industry

Analysis of Private Enterprises' Entry in the Presence of Asymmetric Regulation

The Regulatory Restriction of Natural Monopoly Industry and the Orientation of Its Reform in China

A Research on the Feasibility of the Wage Reform in Monopoly Industry

Efficiency Analysis and Regulate Price of Natural Monopoly Industry

Game Analysis of the Rent -seeking of Chinese Private Enterprises Considering the Political Connections

The Development of Regulatory Theories on Western Natural Monopoly Industry and Comment to Them

Implications of the State Monopoly over Industry and Its Relaxation