Implications of the State Monopoly over Industry and Its Relaxation

B NAUGHTON

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009770049201800102

IF: 0.75

1992-01-01

Modern China

Abstract:This article argues that a single simple interpretative framework explains a great deal about China's reform process. This framework, which I label the monopoly industry framework, can account for many of the most important observed facts in China's industry and financial development over the past decade. In some respects it may be considered a superior alternative to the centralization/decentralization paradigm that has dominated much of the writing about the Chinese reform process. The basic argument is as follows. Chinese economic policy since 1949 has been founded on the government's monopoly control of industry and the price system, which was used to pump resources into government industrialization programs. Economic reforms since 1978 have substantially weakened the government's monopoly, shrinking government fiscal resources while stimulating growth of the nonstate sector. This process has had beneficial economic effects but at the same time, because no new fiscal system has been created to replace industrial monopolies, has also created serious problems. The first selection of this article puts state monopoly control over industry and prices in the context of overall development strategy in the Chinese command economy; it describes three implications of the price structure and development strategy of command economies which have received inadequate attention. The second section briefly describes changes in the role of the government budget since 1978, and shows that these changes are closely linked to changes in the state's monopoly over industry; I hypothesize that changes in the state's monopoly can explain the changes in the role of the budget.