Insights of China's Competition Law and Its Enforcement: the Structural Reform of Anti-Monopoly Authority and the Amended Anti-Unfair Competition Law
Yong Ren,Fengyi Zhang,Jie Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpy068
2019-01-01
Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
Abstract:Ten-years of enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law (‘AML’) in China has achieved great results with the cooperation and support of various competent authorities. However, the multi-sector enforcement at the same time has brought about non-uniform standards and less transparency of the working process. To avoid enforcement conflicts, simplify the enforcement procedures and enhance the efficiency, on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the AML enforcement, a unified and consolidated agency, the Anti-Monopoly Bureau (‘AMB’) under the newly established State Administration for Market Regulation (‘SAMR’) was set up in 2018, aiming to integrate the enforcement experience and official’s resources of previous competent authorities, and to face new challenges in the next decades. As for the international cooperation among anti-monopoly authorities in different jurisdictions, during the enforcement of the AML, China’s anti-monopoly authority has been growing its awareness of the significance of international cooperation in anti-monopoly law enforcement. The authorities previously have signed Memorandums of Understanding on Antitrust Cooperation, ‘BRICS’ Anti-Monopoly Memorandums as well as similar arrangements with the anti-monopoly authorities of many jurisdictions, including the European Union (‘EU’), United States, Japan, South Africa, Russia, Kenya, etc. In addition, China’s anti-monopoly authority attended multiple competition law communication seminars, meetings and conferences held by international organisations including the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (‘OECD’), United Nations Conference on trade (‘UNCTAD’), etc. During the cooperation, China’s anti-monopoly authority carried out communications, project discussion and cooperation in case enforcement and shared experience both in the enforcement process and in the legislation process, e.g. taking suggestions from US anti-monopoly authorities during the legislation of specific enforcement guidelines.