Abstract:Numerical simulation is an important method to study the penetration into targets. Distinct results may be acquired if different kinds of software are adopted. In this paper, three kinds of commonly-used softwares (LS-DYNA, ABAQUS and PAM-CRASH) were adopted to simulate the same series of penetration experiments. The simulation results were analyzed and the advantages and disadvantages of each kind of software were compared. The purpose of this work is to help the researchers and engineers to select the most suitable software. The results in this paper demonstrate that the calculation results of the three kinds of software are basically consistent with the experimental results. The simulation results of the flat-headed projectile are generally better than those of the hemispherical projectile. The residual velocity of the projectile and the plug velocity were simulated well using all of the three kinds of software. The calculated velocities by ABAQUS and PAM-CRASH are closer to the experimental results, and the average relative errors are generally lower than 15%. Moreover, the errors from most calculation results by PAM-CRASH are even less than 10%. However, for the deformation of the projectile, the calculation results of the three kinds of software are quite different from the experimental ones. There are other differences in the performance of the three kinds of software. For example, the ballistic limits calculated by ABAQUS and LS-DYNA are higher than the experimental results, while those by PAM-CRASH are lower. ABAQUS is most likely to report errors but is balanced by calculation time and effects. LS-DYNA has a low error rate and good robustness. The change of model parameters (such as mesh density, friction coefficient, contact stiffness, viscous damping coefficient, etc.) has little effect on its calculation results. PAM-CRASH is greatly affected by model parameters. The conclusion of this paper is based on the following conditions: the target material is Weldox 460E steel, the projectile is ARNE tool steel, and the impact velocity range is 180－450 m/s. However, it is also of guiding significance for the penetration problem simulation of other materials in this velocity range.

Study on Projectile Impact Point Positioning Model Based on Diamond-Shaped Array

Study on Measurement of Impact Point Coordinates with the Combination of Acoustic Array and Optical Detection

The Method of Impact Point Location Based on Planar Double Disk Array

Study Of The Bullet Position Measuring Model With Six Light Screens

Measurement principle of acoustic target with two equilateral triangle array

Impact point location based on seismic wave analysis

Accurate Positioning of Missile Fall Points through Acoustic and Optical Properties of Explosion

Studies of acoustic target with two equilateral triangle arrays

Research of Projectile Impact Point Positioning Skill Based on Wireless Sensor Network

Error Analysis and Optimization of Structural Parameters of Spatial Coordinate Testing System Based on Position-Sensitive Detector

Three-dimensional coordinates test method with uncertain projectile proximity explosion position based on dynamic seven photoelectric detection screen

Research on Accurate Ultrasonic Positioning Error under the Special Environment

Measurement model and accuracy analysis of parabolic ballistic projectile flight parameters based on random matrix

Comparative study of numerical simulations of projectile penetration into metal targets

Research Onmethods of Missile Guidance Precision Analysis

Influence of sensor array on MS/AE source location accuracy in rock mass

A Method to Locate Firing Points by Fusing Double CCD and GIS

Landing Point Location Algorithm Based on Asynchronous Time Difference of Arrival (ATDOA) Method

Numerical Simulation on the Influence of Projectile Shape on Loading Waveform in SHPB Tests of Rocks

Modeling and Analyzing Point Cloud Generation in Missile-Borne LiDAR

Study on the Missile Projectile Parameter Test Technology