Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the mutual interchangeability of 4 cardiac output measuring devices by comparing their accuracy, precision, and trending ability. Design: A single-center prospective observational study. Design: Nonuniversity teaching hospital, single center. Participants: Forty-four consecutive patients scheduled for elective, nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Interventions: The cardiac output was measured for each participant using 4 methods: intermittent thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (ITD-PAC), Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM), FloTrac/Vigileo System (FLOTRAC), and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE). Measurements and main results: Measurements were performed simultaneously at 5 time points: presternotomy, poststernotomy, before cardiopulmonary bypass, after cardiopulmonary bypass, and after sternal closure. A series of statistical and comparison analyses including ANOVA, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plots, quadrant plots, and polar plots were performed, and inherent precision for each method and percent errors for mutual interchangeability were calculated. For the 6 two-by-two comparisons of the methods, the Pearson correlation coefficients (r), the percentage errors (% error), and concordance ratios (CR) were as follows: ECOM_versus_ITD-PAC (r = 0.611, % error = 53%, CR = 75%); FLOTRAC_versus_ITD-PAC (r = 0.676, % error = 49%, CR = 77%); 3D-TEE versus ITD-PAC (r = 0.538, % error = 64%, CR = 67%); FLOTRAC_versus_ECOM (r = 0.627, % error = 51%, CR = 75%); 3D-TEE_versus ECOM (r = 0.423, % error = 70%, CR = 60%), and 3D-TEE_versus_FLOTRAC (r = 0.602, % error = 59%, CR = 61%). Conclusions: Based on the recommended statistical measures of interchangeability, ECOM, FLOTRAC, and 3D-TEE are not interchangeable with each other or to the reference standard invasive ITD-PAC method in patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac bypass surgery. Despite the negative result in this study and the majority of previous studies, these less-invasive methods of CO have continued to be used in the hemodynamic management of patients. Each device has its own distinct technical features and inherent limitations; it is clear that no single device can be used universally for all patients. Therefore, different methods or devices should be chosen based on individual patient conditions, including the degree of invasiveness, measurement performance, and the ability to provide real-time, continuous CO readings.

Comparisons between thermodilution method and arterial pressure cardiac output with rapid volume infusion

Accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement during liver transplantation

Correlation of cardiac output measured by non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) and thermodilution in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

Comparison of Two Cardiac Output Monitors, qCO and LiDCO, During General Anesthesia

A comparison of ClearSight noninvasive cardiac output and pulmonary artery bolus thermodilution cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients

Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference

Comparision of cardiac output measured by transthoracic echocardiography with continuous cardiac output measured by pressure recording analytical method

Validation of the Use of Foreign Gas Rebreathing Method for Non-Invasive Determination of Cardiac Output in Heart Disease Patients

Comparison of Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor and Pulse Indicated Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor on Determination of Hemodynamic Parameters in Critical Patients

Correlation Between PiCCO and ThDCO in Monitoring Perioperative Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Comparison of Carotid Blood Flow Measured by Ultrasound and Cardiac Output in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients

Hemodynamic Parameters Determined by Transesophageal Doppler Echocardiography and Pulmonary Artery Catheter after Volume Administration in Patients Receiving Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Correlation Analysis

Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output and stroke volume measurements using electrical impedance tomography with invasive methods in a swine model

Agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution and pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution cardiac output measurements in pigs

Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Single transpulmonary thermodilution in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: haemodynamic changes and effects of different anaesthetic techniques

Bioreactance noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in euvolemic adult horses subjected with 7.2% saline and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) solution infusions

Non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output (escCO) during severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation

Mathews Journal of Anesthesia Comparison of Two Cardiac Output Monitors , qCO and LiDCO , During General Anesthesia

A Comparision of Cardiac Function Between Balanced Anaesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Elderly Patients