Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the mutual interchangeability of 4 cardiac output measuring devices by comparing their accuracy, precision, and trending ability. Design: A single-center prospective observational study. Design: Nonuniversity teaching hospital, single center. Participants: Forty-four consecutive patients scheduled for elective, nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Interventions: The cardiac output was measured for each participant using 4 methods: intermittent thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (ITD-PAC), Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM), FloTrac/Vigileo System (FLOTRAC), and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE). Measurements and main results: Measurements were performed simultaneously at 5 time points: presternotomy, poststernotomy, before cardiopulmonary bypass, after cardiopulmonary bypass, and after sternal closure. A series of statistical and comparison analyses including ANOVA, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plots, quadrant plots, and polar plots were performed, and inherent precision for each method and percent errors for mutual interchangeability were calculated. For the 6 two-by-two comparisons of the methods, the Pearson correlation coefficients (r), the percentage errors (% error), and concordance ratios (CR) were as follows: ECOM_versus_ITD-PAC (r = 0.611, % error = 53%, CR = 75%); FLOTRAC_versus_ITD-PAC (r = 0.676, % error = 49%, CR = 77%); 3D-TEE versus ITD-PAC (r = 0.538, % error = 64%, CR = 67%); FLOTRAC_versus_ECOM (r = 0.627, % error = 51%, CR = 75%); 3D-TEE_versus ECOM (r = 0.423, % error = 70%, CR = 60%), and 3D-TEE_versus_FLOTRAC (r = 0.602, % error = 59%, CR = 61%). Conclusions: Based on the recommended statistical measures of interchangeability, ECOM, FLOTRAC, and 3D-TEE are not interchangeable with each other or to the reference standard invasive ITD-PAC method in patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac bypass surgery. Despite the negative result in this study and the majority of previous studies, these less-invasive methods of CO have continued to be used in the hemodynamic management of patients. Each device has its own distinct technical features and inherent limitations; it is clear that no single device can be used universally for all patients. Therefore, different methods or devices should be chosen based on individual patient conditions, including the degree of invasiveness, measurement performance, and the ability to provide real-time, continuous CO readings.

Accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement during liver transplantation

Preliminary Study on the Anti-Coagulation and Fibrinolysis Variations in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference

A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques

[Changes in Hemodynamics and Oxygen Metabolism of Different Child-grade Patients During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Without Veno-Venous Bypass].

Validation of the Use of Foreign Gas Rebreathing Method for Non-Invasive Determination of Cardiac Output in Heart Disease Patients

Changes in Hemodynamics in End Stage Liver Failure Patients after Liver Transplantation

Changes in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation ( Rso2 ) During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Without Veno-Venous Bypass

Comparison of Two Cardiac Output Monitors, qCO and LiDCO, During General Anesthesia

Agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution and pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution cardiac output measurements in pigs

A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients

Changes in pulmonary gas exchange and intrapulmonary shunt during orthotopic liver transplantation.

A comparison of ClearSight noninvasive cardiac output and pulmonary artery bolus thermodilution cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients

Comparison of parameter types for the calibration of noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring of patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery in the prone position

Functional Changes of the Heart and Lung in Perioperative Period of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

[Clinical Study on Monitoring Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume in Volume Management During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation].

Comparison of Bioimpedance Versus Pulse Contour Analysis for Intraoperative Cardiac Index Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation

Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Hepatic and Abdominal Carbon Dioxide Measurements Detect and Distinguish Hepatic Artery Occlusion and Portal Vein Occlusion in Pigs

Continuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring Estimates Timing for Detecting Anemia Better Than Clinicians: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparision of cardiac output measured by transthoracic echocardiography with continuous cardiac output measured by pressure recording analytical method