On the Functions of Interpretational Argumentation of Judicial Official Reply and Its Limitations

Sun Xiaoxia,Chu Guojian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2009.06.171
2009-01-01
Abstract:Joint judgment of difficult cases by courts at two levels through cases request system is one of the main features of China's judicial regime.For the division of judgment and argumentation,judicial reply plays an important role in clarifying doubtful points in laws and creating judgment rules.For the methodology of judgment and argumentation,the main body of judicial reply directly provides detailed interpretations/argumentations and guarantees the verification effect of the judgment rules via the leverage of the collective authority of judicial committee.Judicial reply helps to ensure the inner unity and political correctness of the criteria applied.However,it lacks methodological introspection on and development of possible scope of the interpretation for itself and the elaboration on the reasoning of its argumentation.Consummation of existing cases request system may start from consolidation of the argumentation of reply.The supreme court may enclose the main body of the court verdicts for the cases requesting for instructions while publicizing the official replies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?