Authority of and Dissidence to Judicial Decision

Sun Xiaoxia,Chu Guojian
2009-01-01
Abstract:The authority of and dissent to the judgment seem to contradict each other but do coexist in judicial practice. The announcement of dissenting opinions of the minority of the judges along with the court opinions formed by the majority of the judges is the product of the Anglo-American law system; however,it was excluded by most countries of the continental law system such as Germany and France in early periods. After the World War II,the countries of the continental law system gradually adopted the systemic model of limited application of "dissenting opinions" at the court of the highest trial level. The system of "dissenting opinions" plays an active role in showing the democracy of the court,strengthening the reasoning of the judge,promoting the development of laws and comforting the losing party,but has some negative influence. Therefore,it usually applies to the adjudication of difficult cases and must be checked by the judge's virtue of self-restraint to produce positive effects. In China,there is also institutional room for the Supreme Court to introduce the system of "dissenting opinions".
What problem does this paper attempt to address?