Abstract:BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of Univent tube (Fuji Systems, Tokyo, Japan) placement with the aid of auscultation (AUS) or as guided by a lighted stylet (LS) compared with placement guided by the fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) or the blind intubation technique as recommended by the manufacturer's guidelines. METHODS: Eighty ASA physical status I-II adult patients requiring single-lung ventilation for elective thoracic surgery were randomly allocated into 4 groups according to the method used for Univent tube positioning: manufacturer-recornmended (MR) group (n = 20); FOB group (n = 20); AUS group (n = 20); and LS group (n = 20). Tracheal placement of the Univent tube was accomplished with direct rigid laryngoscopy after anesthetic induction and was positioned by the same anesthesiologist using 1 of the above-described methods. Its position was then checked by another anesthesiologist with an FOB. The number of attempts required for successful tube positioning, the volume of air needed for blocker cuff inflation, and intubation times were recorded, as were the times for single-lung ventilation and the potential for bronchial injury. RESULTS: The intubation time was 182 +/- 42 s in the AUS group and 176 50 s in the LS group, shorter than that in the FOB (278 111 s) and MR (266 127 s) (P < 0.05) groups. The success rate of bronchial blocker insertion into the left bronchus on the first attempt was 100% in the AUS group, 79% in the LS group, and 25% in the MR group. The number of blocker insertion attempts and the volume of air in the blocker cuff in the W group were significantly higher than those in the AUS and LS (P < 0.05) groups. In the supine position, the number of acceptable bronchial blocker placements was 14 of 20 attempts (70%) in the W group, significantly fewer than that in the FOB group (18 of 20, 90%) (P < 0.05). In the AUS and IS groups, the number of acceptable bronchial blocker placements was 19 of 20 (95%) and 16 of 20 (80%), respectively. After patients were turned to the lateral decubitus position, the number of acceptable bronchial blocker placements was 10 of 18 (56%) in the MR group, significantly fewer than that in the FOB group (17 of 19, 89.5%) (P < 0.05). In the AUS and IS groups, the number of acceptable bronchial blocker placements was 15 of 20 (75%) and 15 of 19 (79%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of the Univent tube with the aid of AUS or an LS is feasible, and both techniques require less time than placement aided by an FOB or as recommended by the manufacturer. (Anesth Analg 2010; 110:508 -14)

Application of Minor Auscultation Method in Positioning of Right Double Lumen-endobronchial Tube

Efficacy of Ultrasound for Placement of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adult Patients: a Comparison with Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

Combination of computed tomography measurements and flexible video bronchoscope guidance for accurate placement of the right-sided double-lumen tube: a randomised controlled trial

Evaluation of Endotracheal Intubation with a Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Lateral Patient Positioning: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Three Methods for the Confirmation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement in Female Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery.

Application study on the improved electronic endoscope for positioning by double-lumen endobronchial tube

The feasibility and accuracy of the method for selecting the optimal size of double-lumen tube in thoracic surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

A Comparison of Conventional Rotating Method and Non-Rotating Method for Double-Lumen Tube Insertion Using a Customized Rigid J-Shaped Stylet for One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Placement of the Univent tube without fiberoptic bronchoscope assistance.

Comparison of safety between double lumen-tube and endobronchial occluder for single-lung ventilation

A quality improvement study of the placement and complications of double-lumen endobronchial tubes

Endotracheal Intubation under Video Laryngoscopic Guidance During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgery in the Left Lateral Position

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of an Improved Double-Lumen Tube Ventilation Control Device Versus A Conventional Device in Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Value of Disposcope-guided left-sided double-lumen tube intubation

Difficult Intubation and Management Strategy of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube in Anesthesia Induction: a Retrospective Study of 11 017 Patients for Thoracic Surgery

A randomised comparison of the efficacy of a Coopdech bronchial blocker and a double-lumen endotracheal tube for minimally invasive esophagectomy

Analysis of the Association Between Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube and Inner Diameter of the Left Main Bronchus

[Comparison of Two Shaping Methods for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation by Shikani Optical Stylet Laryngoscope].

Clinical Application of Robertshaw Double Lumen Tube Incubation for Mechanical Ventilation in 350 Patients

Estimation of the depth of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube placement using preoperative chest radiographs

Comparison of the One-lung Ventilation Effectiveness between the Improved Disposable Unilateral Bronchial Blockers Tube and Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube