Comparison of safety between double lumen-tube and endobronchial occluder for single-lung ventilation

Yan-hua Qiu,Tai-di Zhong,Li-jun Liao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.22.001

2008-01-01

Abstract:Background: Double lumen-tube is frequently used in clinic for single-lung ventilation. However, the tube placement and location takes much time and there are many complications such injured bronchus, vocal cord and throat postoperatively. Objective: To compare the safety and impact on the incidence and severity of postoperative hoarseness, vocal cord lesions, and sore throat between double lumen-tube and endobronchial occluder for single-lung ventilation. Design, Time and Setting: Randomized controlled observation was performed at Ningbo Medical Treatment Center Lihuili Hospital from January 2006 to October 2007. Participants: 100 patients who underwent resection of esophageal cancer by single-lung ventilation were randomly divided into endobronchial occluder and double lumen-tube groups (n=50). Methods: All patients were subjected to single-lung ventilation by endobronchial occluder or double lumen-tube, respectively. The tracheal intubation was performed by the same anesthetist. Main Outcome Measures: 1 The time for intubation; 2 Atelectasis and exposure extent in surgery at single-lung ventilation; 3 Postoperative hoarseness and sore throat were assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours, and bronchial injuries and vocal cord lesions were examined by bronchoscopy immediately after surgery. Results: The time for intubation in double lumen-tube group was longer than endobronchial occluder group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean arterial blood pressure and basic vital sign before and after intubation between two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in atelectasis and exposure extent in surgery between two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative hoarseness occurred significantly more frequently in the double-lumen group than in the endobronchial occluder group (P < 0.05). The incidence of bronchial injuries was nearly equivalent in two groups (P > 0.05). No major complications such as bronchial ruptures were observed in both groups. Conclusion: Single-lung ventilation can be achieved via either a double lumen-tube or an endobronchial occluder. However, occluder is recommended for single-lung ventilation because it can reduce the incidence of vocal cord injuries, postoperative hoarseness, and sore throat.