F-096THE IMPACT OF VENTILATION STRATEGIES DURING THORACOSCOPIC MINIMALLY INVASIVE OESOPHAGECTOMY ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS: TWO-LUNG VERSUS ONE-LUNG VENTILATION

hao wang,yi shen,fang fang,min feng,wei jiang,jing cang,liqiang tan,qingsong wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu167.96
2014-01-01
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:Objectives: Pulmonary complication remains common morbidity after thoracoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE), partially due to lung injury caused by one-lung ventilation (OLV). We attempted two-lung ventilation (TLV) with low tidal volume in semi-prone position assisted by artificial CO2 pneumothorax. This study aimed to compare the impact of two ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complications. Methods: From March 2011 to August 2013, 200 patients underwent thoracoscopic MIE. The initial 100 patients performed with OLV (succeeded in 99, with 1 case conversion), and the later half performed with TLV (succeeded in 99, with 1 case conversion). During thoracic stage, patients in the OLV group were intubated with a double-lumen endotracheal tube and given 8 ml/kg tidal volume; while in the TLV group, patients were intubated with a single-lumen endotracheal tube and also given 8 ml/kg tidal volume. An artificial CO2 pneumothorax was achieved at pressure of 8 mmHg. Meanwhile, a pre-placed bronchial blocker was used in case of conversion to thoracotomy. During the abdominal and cervical stage, all patients performed two-lung ventilation. Patients' demographics and clinical outcomes were recorded and statistically compared. Results: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in demographics, blood loss, lymph nodes harvested, postoperative hospital stay, total complications or 30-day mortality. The thoracic operative time was longer in the TLV group than in OLV (85.4 ± 13.4 min vs 74.8 ± 11.2 min, P = 0.000). The occurrence of pulmonary complications in the TLV group was lower (9.1% vs 20.2%, P = 0.027). Reintubation for ARDS/ALI was given in 12 patients (3 in TLV and 9 in OLV). The oxygenation index was significantly higher in the TLV group than OLV group on POD 1 (319.2 ± 31.3 vs 298.2 ± 29.9, P = 0.000) and POD 2 (330.8 ± 33.3 vs 318.0 ± 32.4, P = 0.006). Conclusions: Two-lung ventilation with low tidal volume during MIE in semi-prone position appears to be feasible, safe and effective. It may attenuate postoperative pulmonary complications. Additional RCT studies are required to confirm this conclusion. Disclosure: No significant relationships.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?