Comparison of clinical efficacy of different ventilation modes for removal of airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients
Ying XIAO,Na DUAN,Wei WANG,Jian WEN,Guixia JING,Qiang WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13753/j.issn.1007-6611.2017.06.024
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare clinical anesthesia effects and safety of different ventilation modes for removal of airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients.Methods Eighty pediatric patients were randomly allocated to spontaneous breathing group(n =40) and controlled respiration group (n =40).The patients in spontaneous breathing group received dexmedetomidine at initial dose of 4 μg/kg and propofol at initial dose of 150 μg/(kg.min),followed by continuous infusion of 0.8-1.0 μg/(kg · h) 80-120 μg/(kg · min),respectively.The doses of dexmedetomidine and propfol were adjusted for reserving spontaneous breathing during the procedure.The patients in controlled respiration group received propofol at initial dose of 3-5 mg/kg,remifentanyl at initial dose of 2μg/kg and succinylcholine at initial dose of 2 mg/kg,followed by continuous infusion of 150-200 μg/(kg ·min),0.05 μg/(kg ·min) and intermittent infusion of 2 mg/kg,respectively.Mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR),peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2),PET CO2,bispectral index(BIS) were recorded at baseline value before anaesthesia(T0),after induction(T1),after insertion of rigid bronchoscope (T2),at 10 min after insertion of rigid bronchoscope(T3),after the withdrawing of rigid bronchoscope(T4) and at the returning ward (T5).The success rate of first insertion of bronchoscope,the duration of the operation,the recovery time from anesthesia,the success rate of removal of foreign bodies and the condition for perioperative adverse events,such as laryngospasm,arhythmia,body movement,breathing hold,postoperative agitation,hypoxemia,pneumothorax were recorded.Results Compared with T0,HR showed no significant decrease at T1-T5 in controlled respiration group (P ＞ 0.05),while HR decreased significantly at T1-T5 in spontaneous breathing group(P ＜ 0.05).Compared with controlled respiration group,-HR was significantly decreased at T1-T5 in spontaneous breathing group (P ＜ 0.05).Compared with T0,MAP decreased significantly at T1-T5 in controlled respiration group,but MAP was significantly higber in T1-T4 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group (P ＜ 0.05).SpO2was significantly higher at T3 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group.PET C02 was significantly lower at T4 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group.BIS value was significantly lower at T1-T4 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group(P ＜0.05).The recovety time was significantly longer in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group (P ＜ 0.05),but the duration of operation,the incidences of postoperative agitation and hypoxemia were significantly lower in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group(P ＜ 0.05).The anesthesia effect was significantly better in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Performing ventilation mode of reserving spontaneous breathing for removal of airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients could provide the adequate sedation and reduce the incidence of hypoxemia.But to enhance the perioperative monitoring,timely adjust the depth of anesthesia and prevent the respiratory and circulation depression are necessary.