Abstract:Kamga et al. [1] evaluated the performance of the Airtraq® (Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain) videolaryngoscope for awake flexible nasal bronchoscopy in patients with an anticipated difficult airway. To differentiate the effect of one factor on the primary outcome in a randomised controlled trial, all other factors must be standardised to avoid potential bias. However, other than the limitations described in the discussion section, we have noted several issues in the methods and results of this study that have not been addressed. First, as a gold standard technique for management of an anticipated difficult airway, adequate airway anaesthesia and sedation are vital for success and patient comfort [2]. In the methods, the authors provide details of airway anaesthesia in the Airtraq group, but not the anaesthetic techniques used for the upper and lower airways in the flexible bronchoscopy group. It would be interesting to know if same methods were used for both groups. Both the nerve blocks and transtracheal injection used in this study are invasive procedures. For patient comfort, we favour the use of only topical local anaesthesia of the airway in combination with a standard or modified ‘spray as you go’ technique when awake tracheal intubation is performed with either the fibreoptic bronchoscope or videolaryngoscope [3, 4]. Second, for a comparative study of airway devices, equal competence of participants with the studied tools is mandatory [5]. We note that up to 72% of cases were performed by trainees in this study. The experience of an expert was clearly defined, but experience of trainees in these techniques was not provided. The results of this study show that success rate of awake tracheal intubation for trainees under expert supervision was only 69% with the Airtraq and 82% with the bronchoscope, indicating low competence for both tools. It is unclear whether the trainers participating in this study were evenly distributed in both groups. We are concerned that significant between-group differences in the competence of trainees with both studied tools have biased the findings of this small study. Third, it was unclear why two intubation pathways were utilised, that is, nasal with the bronchoscope and oral with the Airtraq. This may further confuse the interpretation of primary and secondary outcomes. Finally, in the design of this non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, both an 8% non-inferiority limit and similar success rates of 99% for both studied tools were hypothesised. The results show that the success rate was 82% (32/39) with the Airtraq and 97% (38/39) with the bronchoscope. An absolute between-group risk difference of 15% exceeds the designed non-inferiority limit (see Fig. 2, Kamga et al. [1]). Most important, all seven videolaryngoscopy failures were successful following conversion to fibreoptic-guided intubation. In these cases, we cannot agree with the authors that the Airtraq is not non-inferior to the fibreoptic bronchoscope in this setting.

Vestibular compensation: new clinical and basic science perspectives.

Comparison of the anesthetic effects of propofol combined with remifentanil or sevoflurane during interventional treatment of congenital heart disease in children

Induction efficay of sevoflurane and sevoflurane combined with propofol for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants

Anesthesia and ventilation for removal of airway foreign bodies in 35 infants

Proper dose of intranasal administration of remifentanil after sevoflurane induction of anesthesia without relaxants in children

Tracheal intubation with or without a neuromuscular blocking agent for a short surgical procedure in children: Prospective, randomized, double‐blind trial

Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Sevoflurane Inhalation Combining Laryngeal Mask Airway and Ketamine Anesthesia for Anesthesia Induction

[Clinical Comparison of Sevoflurane and Propofol Anesthesia with Propofol and Remifentanil Anesthesia for Children with Cleft Lip and Palate Repair Surgery].

Effect of atropine on endotracheal intubation time with rocuronium in children

[A simple method for the determination of 11-desoxycortisol in small amounts of plasma using competitive protein binding analysis].

A randomized comparison of target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol with desflurane and fentanyl for laryngeal surgery

Comparison of effective inspired concentration of sevoflurane in preterm infants with different postconceptual ages.

Investigation into the application of remimazolamin conjunction with low-dose propofolfor pediatricfiberoptic bronchoscopy

Effect of remifentanil and midazolam for direct laryngoscopy in the conscious patient

Efficacy and Safety of Propofol combined with different doses of Remifentanil for gastroscopy: A-randomized controlled trial

Comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane on postoperative recovery quality after tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children

[Observational study of complications connected with the use of the laryngeal mask airway and sevoflurane anesthesia in children].

Titration of sevoflurane anesthesia to optimize the time to regain airway reflexes in patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia

[Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during operation with suspension laryngoscopy].

The effect of an elemental diet on gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) in rats.

Comparing Performance of Flexible Bronchoscopy with Videolaryngoscopy for Awake Tracheal Intubation