Comparison of the anesthetic effects of propofol combined with remifentanil or sevoflurane during interventional treatment of congenital heart disease in children

Jianshe WANG,Xiaoping GU,Longde ZHAO
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility and effects of laryngeal mask airway ( LMA) and propofol com-bined with remifentanil or sevoflurane in interventional treatment of congenital heart disease in children .Methods 40 ASA I-II child patients were randomly divided into propofol +remifentanil ( PR) group and propofol +sevoflurane ( PS) group (20 in each) before intervention treatment of congenital heart disease .All patients underwent basic anesthesia by intravenous injection of 2 mg/kg ketamine followed by anesthesia induction with 2 mg/kg propofol.Then, the PR group received 1.0 g/kg of remifentanil , while the PS group inhaled sevoflurane .Next, LMA was applied in both groups once the patients became unconscious .For maintenance of anesthesia , 6 mg· kg-1 · h-1 of propofol and 0.05-0.1 μg· kg-1 · min-1 of remifentanil were delivered in the PR group through continuous infusion , while 6 mg · kg-1 · h-1 of propofol and 1%-3%of sevoflurane were given in the PS group .The mean arterial pressure ( MAP) , heart rate ( HR) , blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR) and partial pressure of end -tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) val-ues of both groups were recorded before induction ( T0) , before and 3 min after implantation of laryngeal mask ( T1 and T2), at the end of surgery (T3) and after removal of laryngeal mask (T4) .Also, intraoperative and postoperative ad-verse reactions and awakening time were observed .Results The levels of HR , MAP and RR of both groups were lower at T1, T2 and T3 than at T0 (P<0.05).Compared with the PS group, the PR group presented remarkable reduction in HR and MAP, lower incidences of restlessness , nausea and vomiting, but delayed recovery from anesthesia (P<0.05). No statistical differences were found in SpO 2 of both groups at each time point .The RR had little effect on ventilation de-spite lower RR were recorded at T1 and T2 in the PR group than that in the PS group (P<0.05).Conclusions Propo-fol can be safely applied in combination with either remifentanil or sevoflurane for intervention treatment of congenital heart disease in children .LMA can be adopted for better airway control .When propofol is applied in combination with sevoflurane, patients can display more stable hemodynamic changes and shorter awakening time , despite higher inci-dences of postoperative restlessness , nausea and vomiting .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?