Comparison of rigid bronchoscopy and flexible bronchoscopy for the management of foreign body aspiration in children
Da Li,Nana Yang,Jinye Dong,Jinju Wang,Xin Cui,Hailing Yu,Yuxin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104092
Abstract:Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of flexible and rigid bronchoscopies for the management of foreign body aspiration (FBA) in different airway locations, especially in unilateral main bronchus, in children, so as to provide some suggestions to assist clinical decisions. Methods: The medical records of children diagnosed with FBA in Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University from January 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The following information was collected: demographics, radiological findings, endoscopic findings, foreign body locations, duration of operation, operation cost, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: 182 children were included in the study with the median age of 1.3 years (interquatile range, 1.0-1.8). Among whom, 124 cases (68.1 %) were male and 58 cases (31.9 %) were female. 11 cases (6.0 %) had the foreign bodies located in the trachea (larynx to carina), 3 cases (1.6 %) located in the trachea and lower bronchus, 1 case (0.5 %) located in bilateral main bronchus, 135 cases (74.2 %) located in unilateral main bronchus, 4 cases (2.2 %) located in main and lobar bronchus, and 28 cases (15.4 %) located in the lobar or segmental bronchus. Among all the included children, 84 cases (46.2 %) received rigid bronchoscopy (RB) and 98 cases (53.8 %) received flexible bronchoscopy (FB). 131 cases with the foreign bodies located in unilateral main bronchus received one type of bronchoscopy (RB or FB). They were divided into two groups according to the location of foreign body relative to the midpoint of main bronchus, the proximal bronchus group and the distal bronchus group. In the proximal bronchus group, duration of operation using RB and FB was 15 (12.5-27.5) min and 15 (14.5-30.0) min, respectively (Z = 0.000, P = 1.000). The intraoperative and postoperative complication rate using RB and FB was 15.4 % and 9.1 %, respectively (χ2 = 0.008, P = 0.927). Operation cost of FB was significantly higher than that of RB (t = -13.396, P = 0.000). In the distal bronchus group, duration of operation using RB was 20 (13.5-25.0) min, which was drastically shorter than that of FB (25 (20.0-35.0) min) (Z = -2.947, P=0.003). Operation cost of FB was still found to be significantly higher than RB (t = -20.456, P=0.000). No significant difference was found in complication rate of RB (14.3%) compared to FB (8.3%) (χ2=0.251, P=0.616). Conclusions: When foreign bodies are lodged in unilateral main bronchus, RB could be chosen as the first-choice procedure with advantages in duration of operation and operation cost, especially for patients in China. Regardless of duration of operation and operation cost, FB is also a safe and efficient therapeutic procedure to remove inhaled foreign bodies in children, except for those located in the trachea and asphyxiating foreign bodies.