Abstract:In the Qing Dynasty, the dispute between Jinwenand Guwen was a part of the disputes of Sinology between Neo-Confucianism, and the dispute evolved into a pivot of political and academic transformation in the late Qing and early Republic of China.With a view to reforming the ritual system by returning to the ancient political system, the movement which reexamine Chinese studies from disciplinary perspectives and discussed ancient history focused on differentiating and analyzing classics documents in order to eliminate the rationality of the political and educational system in Confucian ethics and rites.In the modern time, the New Culture generation of scholars promoted the historiography of classics.However, it is necessary to further probe into the academic division within traditional Chinese scholarship, and to study how the academic methods, issues and ideas inherited by scholars of different schools were developed and transcended by scholars of the Republic of China, leading to a pluralistic path in response to the integration of Chinese and western civilizations.In the 1930s, the historiography of classics had become a foregone conclusion.How to transcend the dispute of Jinwen and Guwen and deal with the ideas, methods and materials of classics in the way of history became the focus of the academic circle, thus opening a new round of controversy between Jinwen and Guwen.Scholars such as Qian Xuantong, Gu Jiegang and Meng Wentong called it ″Beyond the Jinwen″, and this transcendence and transformation became the starting point for scholars to practice new academic studies.In the academic circle of the Republic of China, there were different ways to inherit and surpass traditional Confucian classics.In the historical concept of the Guwen, the Six Classics were regarded as the ancient political documents, and the ancient history was separated from the spirit of Confucianism.The New Culture generation of scholars aimed to construct a course of internal cultural evolution course by means of historiography so as to change the study of classics into historiography, and construct the framework of Chinese cultural history without being limited by the Confucian re-creation of Chinese standard culture.The scholar Hu Shi put forward the idea of ″returning to Liao Ping″ to review the rationality of Liao Ping's division of Jinwen and Guwen by the system of rites.The scholar Qian Mu traced the academic evolution of Qin and Han Dynasties by historical facts, solved the dispute between Jinwen and Guwen, and was opposed to forced similarities and differences in the classics.Qian Xuantong and Gu Jiegang took a perspective of explicatory and analytical study, further historicized the issue of Jinwenand Guwen, and advocated going beyond the dispute over Jinwenand Guwen.Gu Jiegang advocated that Beyond the Jinwenshould absorb the criticism of Neo-Confucianism and the textual research of Sinology, so as to get rid of the old and bring forth the new, and clarify the evolution of Chinese history and culture.Based on Jinwen, Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng emphasized the dynamic interaction of Classics, institution, and historical facts, and examine the sciences from a Chinese-studies perspective.They attempted to carry forward the New Confucianism of Qin and Han Dynasties to establish the core values of Chinese civilization and construct the dynamic relationship between Confucianism and historical evolution.They started the Confucianism-oriented historiography in the modern academic context.By examining the historical context in which various schools of thought have transcended the debate between Jinwenand Guwen, and by integrating methods and objectives, we can not only examine the complex connotation of the transformation of modern classics and history, but also reflect on and enrich the methods and significance of current historical studies, in order to turn historical studies into the source of the subjectivity of civilization.

Five Men of Honour by Yan Yanzhi and the Transformation of Poems on History

Beyond the Jinwenand the Transformation from Classics to Historiography in Modern China

Reform of the Traditional Historiography and Compilation of the New History:the Purport of A History of Chinese Historiography by Jin Yufu

New Historical Materials of Poets' Deeds in the Tang Dynasty

Poetic Civilazation in Mutual Interpretation between Poetry and History——Chen Yinke and Qian Mu′s Free Intention in Their Poetics Interpretations

On the new pattern of literature in Wu Ze-tian's period

Style, Origin and Position: The Songs of Ouyang Xiu

Folk Heroic Epics:Imagination of Zhang Chengzhi and Zhang Wei

On the Historical Poems of Middle-late Tang Dynasty

A critical Review of Researches into the Poetry of the Han,Wei and Six Dynasties in the First Half of the 20th Century

A History of Research on Yuefu Poetry During the First Half of the 20~(th) Century

On the Guyi of Han and Wei Five-word Poems

Historical Poems on Ma Wei in the Late Tang Dynasty and the Change of Poems of the Same Type

On the Variation of Poetry from Han, Wei to Six Dynasties

The Construction of New Poetry’s Ethics during the May Fourth Movement and the Writing of Modern Chinese Poetry

The Differentiated Stylistic Ideas and the Meaning of History of Poetry in Jiang Yan's Varied Imitation Poems

On the Relationship between A Classified Anthology of Popular Chinese Poems with Liu Kezhuang and Jianghu Poetic School

On the Development of the Ancient Style Poetry in the Early and Middle Tang Dynasty

From General to Cultural Symbol --- The Romance of Three Kingdoms and the History of Changes in Guan Yu Persona

Evolution of the Pre-Qin Theory of Shi Yan Zhi and Different Interpretations

On Technique of Historical Imagination in the Tang Poetry