We Still Can Not Study Ornithology inside the House--An query on Hempel's dissolution

Dun Xinguo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-905X.2005.03.028
2005-01-01
Abstract:The confirmation paradoxes that Hempel discovered shows that a red shoe confirms the hypotheis that all ravens are black, which implies we can do the ornithological study inside the door. It is very counterintuitive, so Hempel proposed the dissolution to them. This dissolutive tragedy is to keep the Equivalence Condition and discard the Irrelevant Condition of the Nicod Condition. To keep the Equivalence Condition is very ad hoc, so it isn't convincing. However, to keep the Irrelevant Condition doesn't cause any paradoxes necessarily; to discard it can not escape paradoxes yet. So Hempel's dissolution can not be certified as a good one.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?