Abstract:Induction is fundamental to the acquisition of human knowledge. Twenty-four centuries ago, Plato raised the point that people have much more knowledge than what appears to be present in the information to which they have been exposed. Chomsky referred to it as Plato’s problem to describe the gap between knowledge and experience[1]. Induction can be regarded as an important property of intelligence. Human beings have the ability of generalizing from already known cases to new unknown cases with which they share similarities or patterns. Actually, people have been seeking patterns in data throughout human history. Hunters seek patterns in animal migration behavior in order to hunt for survival, farmers seek patterns in crop growth in order to feed themselves and their families, businessmen seek patterns from markets to make profit, and politicians seek patterns in voter opinions in order to be elected. A scientist’s job is to make sense of observed evidence (or data) in order to discover the patterns that govern how the physical world works and encapsulate them in theories that can be used for predicting what will happen in the future. Scientists are the first group of people who woke up and dared to argue with the followers of the Almighty on the issues such as the earth is not the center of the universe and human beings, like all other species, have evolved to what they are today. The powerful tool they have been employing, so called science, is based on such a hypothesis-evidence paradigm. With the development of new measuring tools, we can always find more new evidence about the nature and our hypothesis spaces have been updated again and again by those giants like Copernicus, Newton, Maxwell, Darwin and Einstein.

The Methodological Research of Inductive Paradoxes

From Situation- absent to Situation- sensitive--The Development and Inspiration of Confirmation Paradoxes Research

An Epistemological Solution to the Paradox of Confirmation

The Situation - sensitive Trend of Study on Lottery Paradox

Paradox and Thinking of Solving Paradox

Resolving Bertrand's Probability Paradox

Methods of Paradox

On Popper's Solution to the Inductive Problem from the Perspective of Grue Problem

Induction and Learning

A Study of the Paradoxes in Decision-making Logic

Queries on Hempel’s Solution to the Paradoxes of Confirmation

Queries on Hempel' s Logic of Instantial Confirmation

Context, World of Life and Paradox——Paradox Studies from the View of Hermeneutics and Pragmatics

A New Approach to Material Implication Paradoxes from the Perspective of Formal Implication to Resolve the'Counterexample'of Paradoxical Theorem

Conceptual Space Solution to the New Riddle of Induction

On Semantic Paradoxes from the Perspective of Substructural Logics

We Still Can Not Study Ornithology inside the House--An query on Hempel's dissolution

Wittgenstein, Peirce, and paradoxes of mathematical proof

The Falsifiabilism Solution to the Grue Paradox

The Language Structure of Paradox:Recursive Negation

The Prioritized Inductive Logic Programs