Abstract:The conjunction fallacy is the well-documented reasoning error on which people rate a conjunction A∧B as more probable than one of its conjuncts, A . Many explanations appeal to the fact that B has a high probability in the given scenarios, but Katya Tentori and collaborators have challenged such approaches. They report experiments suggesting that degree of confirmation —rather than probability—is the central determinant of the conjunction fallacy. In this paper, we have two goals. First, we address a confound in Tentori et al.'s experiments: they failed to control for the fact that in their stimuli where B is confirmed, it is also conversationally relevant in the sense that it fits with the topic or question under discussion . Conversely, when B has a high probability but is not confirmed, it is conversationally irrelevant . Consequently, it is possible that conversational relevance, rather than confirmation, is responsible for the differences they found between confirmed and probable hypotheses. Second, inspired by recent theoretical work, we aim to give the first empirical investigation of the hypothesis that this type of conversational relevance on its own—independently of degree of confirmation—can be an important factor in the conjunction fallacy. We report on two experiments that vary Tentori et al.'s design by making B relevant without changing its degree of probability or confirmation. We found that doing so increases the rate of the conjunction fallacy, suggesting that relevance plays an important role in the conjunction fallacy.

ON THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF THE CONVERSE CONSEQUENCE CONDITION AND HEMPELIAN QUALITATIVE CONFIRMATION

Queries on Hempel’s Solution to the Paradoxes of Confirmation

Queries on Hempel' s Logic of Instantial Confirmation

We Still Can Not Study Ornithology inside the House--An query on Hempel's dissolution

An Epistemological Solution to the Paradox of Confirmation

From Situation- absent to Situation- sensitive--The Development and Inspiration of Confirmation Paradoxes Research

On Constraint Qualification for an Infinite System of Convex Inequalities in a Banach Space.

On the consistency among prior, posteriors, and information sets

On Basic Constraint Qualifications for Infinite System of Convex Inequalities in Banach Spaces

CONSERVATIVITY FOR THEORIES OF COMPOSITIONAL TRUTH VIA CUT ELIMINATION

Constraint Qualification, the Strong CHIP, and Best Approximation with Convex Constraints in Banach Spaces.

Conditional Expectations of Correspondences

(Core) Common Ground Once More: Response to Liu and Liu

Copenhagen Interpretation Can Survive the Upgraded Schrödinger’s cat Gedankenexperiment

The conjunction fallacy: confirmation or relevance?

Information combination and transformation: a paradox and its resolution

Unambiguous Discrimination of Mixed States: A Description Based on System-Ancilla Coupling

A Clarification of Quine's Critique on Dichotomy between the Analytic and the Synthetic

Comment: the Essential Tension Between Parsimony and Accuracy

Efficient Fusion Approach for Conflicting Evidence

Confirming the Null: Remarks on Equivalence Testing and the Topology of Confirmation