Obstacles to a Thorough Understanding of Modern Chinese History
Gail Hershatter,Wang Zheng
2010-01-01
Abstract:Historiography places great emphasis on making distinctions.This sets it apart from most Social Sciences,which mainly seek synthesis.Therefore,historical research does not lend itself to grand summations,but rather to thorough understanding.However,making distinctions is not merely paying attention to the particular.Rather,it places even more weight on the whole in order to study the particular in light of the whole and seek out the pervasive links between individual cases.The thorough understanding of modern Chinese history not only needs to link ancient and modern,Chinese and foreign,but also needs to bridge all fields of study.However,in recent years historiography,which originally ought to be an integrated body of knowledge,has been continuously fragmented by the great variety of historical data and the pressures of departmental teaching and research agendas.Specialization is all the fashion,and reading is just a tool for professional development.When inappropriate standards of academic exchange and evaluation are added into the mix,together with a tendency to "trim our feet to fit our shoes" and "cut our suits without measuring our figures," the result is deepening scholarly turmoil.Only by returning to historiography's original principles,by grasping its system of knowledge and the origins and evolutions of its various divisions,by distilling the complex down to the simple,by reading widely and with open minds,by gaining new knowledge through reviewing what we know,by freeing our research of departmental prejudices and restrictions,and by following a well-thought-out plan,will we be able to do research with skill and ease and avoid mistaking the partial for the whole.