Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

The Principles of Administrative Remedy of China

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

On Administrative System Reform in Rule of Administrative Organization Law

Should the Principle of Mediation Be Established in Administrative Litigation

Some Suggestions on Amending Administrative Litigation Law in China

The Systematization and the Reform of Administrative Law Theory in China

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

New Views over the Principles of Administrative Legislation

On the Direction,Points and Scheme of the Revision of China's Adminsitrative Procedure Law——An Expert Recommended Draft of the Adminsitrative Procedure Law from Renmin University of China

On the Modification of The Administrative Procedure Law and the Concept of Administration Under Rule of Law

Study on the Perfection of Constitutional Remedies in China

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

The Bureau of Public Order: An Aproach to Improving Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement

Theoretical Examination and Systematic Reconstruction on Mediation of Administrative Litigation in China

Dilemma of Application of the Principle of Necessity and the Way Out of It

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

The Analysis of the Untoward Circumstances and Routes of Administrative Policy-Making by Legal System in China

The Status Quo, Problems and Construction of the System of Administrative Action Null and Void in China

Another Remarkable Work Which Push Administrative Rule by Law in China--On BASIC THEORY RESEARCH ON CHINESE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW written by Yang Hai - kun and Zhang Zhi - yuan