Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

Dilemma of Application of the Principle of Necessity and the Way Out of It

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

On the Application of Principle of ‘Nemo Tenetur Se Ipsum Accusare’ to Administrative Investigation

The Principles of Administrative Remedy of China

On the Principle of Equality in Administrative Law

A Study on Legal Attributes of Necessity Defense

A Research on the Law Priority Doctrine in Administrative Law

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

A Comparative Study of the Rule of Reasonableness and the Principle of Proportionality

Theory Abent Nulity of Administrative Actien

On Form Natural Justice to Due Process——The Transplantation of Legal Thoughts on the Legistation of Administrative

The Regulation of the Principle of Proportionality on Administrative Coercive Power

The Formation and Progress of the Theory of Shrink of Administrative Discretion:From the Perspective of Administration to Prevent Dangers

On the Applying Civil Law Norms to Administrative Law