Abstract:The concepts of proactive and passive administration were initially devised out of practical administrative needs to break the longstanding practices of inaction and complacency, and policies were subsequently established before being incorporated into our legal system. Consequently, despite being codified in positive law, these systems have caused confusion due to the lack of fully established normative content, such as concepts, types, and criteria for judgment. This paper focuses particularly on the unclear relationship between proactive and passive administration and the duty of diligence imposed on administrative agencies and public officials. By conducting a legal review centered on this relationship, it aims to clarify the essence of proactive and passive administration, thereby contributing to the effective operation of related systems. The duty of diligence is understood as a comprehensive concept that fundamentally requires faithfully performing duties within the given legal framework. In contrast, proactive administration is interpreted as an expansive concept that not only adheres to the given legal framework but also strives to improve legislation, amend policies, and achieve public interest and administrative objectives. Given this understanding, it is inappropriate to regard proactive administration as a narrow legal obligation. Instead, the focus should be on indemnifying disadvantages and promoting proactive administration. Furthermore, the current system lacks established criteria for judgment and evaluation indicators for proactive administration, indicating a need for consistent and specific standards and indicators. On the other hand, passive administration should not simply be seen as the opposite of proactive administration or a failure to fulfill the duty of diligence. It should be categorized to include result indicators that infringe on citizens' rights or cause financial loss to the state. Considering that passive administration applies independent disciplinary standards and holds not only the offenders but also their supervisors accountable, its applicability must be strictly assessed. The hope is that proactive and passive administration, when implemented and effectively operated in alignment with their essence and purpose, can become leading concepts in realizing true popular sovereignty and substantive rule of law.

A Research on the Law Priority Doctrine in Administrative Law

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Concepts,Systems and Practical Innovation of Administration According to Law

Primacy of Protecting the Citizens' Legal Rights is the Important Principle of the Legislation of Administrative Litigation --some Suggestions on Amending Administrative Litigation Law of Our Country

On the Principle of Equality in Administrative Law

An Analysis of Development of Administrative Law and the Science of Administrative Law of China in the New Century——The View of Legislative Policy Study on Separation of Powers and Centralization of Powers

Legal Control on Administrative Investigation

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

The Principles of Administrative Remedy of China

Research on the Effective Operation of Proactive Administrative Systems - Focusing on the Relationship with the Duty of Diligence

New Views over the Principles of Administrative Legislation

A Developmental Research on Modern Administrative Activity Mode

Some Suggestions on Amending Administrative Litigation Law in China

The Regulation of the Principle of Proportionality on Administrative Coercive Power

New Administrative Law and Administration by Constitution

Law Control on the Administrative Free Judgment

On the Modification of The Administrative Procedure Law and the Concept of Administration Under Rule of Law

On Administrative Plan

The principle,Concept and Defect of Tax Law Enforcement with the Administration According to Law