Internal Fixation Versus Conservative Treatment for Unstable Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients:a Meta-Analysis

曹露,顾海俊,王赤宇,李晓林
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5572.2010.05.002
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare outcomes of conservative and operative treatments for unstable distal radius fractures in older patients by a comprehensive Meta-analysis of the current literature available.Methods We searched MEDLINE(1980~2008)、EMBASE(1980~2008)、BIOMED CENTRAL(1997~2008)、OVID(1993~2008)、CNKI(1994~2008)、Wanfang Date(1993~2008) for articles pertinent to clinical research of outcomes of conservative and operative treatments for distal radius fractures in older patients.Meta-analysis and forest plots were conducted with RevMan 4.2 software.Results fifty-six articles were included in the present review,involving 21(967 patients) conservative treatment and 35(1672 patients) operative treatment studies.Meta-analysis detected statistically significant differences in pooled grip strength、wrist range of motion,radiographic alignment and physical-rated outcomes between the 2 groups,but did not detect statistically significant differences in PatientRated Wrist Evaluation(PRWE) and the satisfaction of the patients.Conclusion In treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in older patients,although operative internal fixtions have more advantages compared to conservative treatments,there is not statistically significant differences in the satisfaction of the patients.The treatment method of the aged distal radius fracture should be objectively choosed,respect the patient′s expectation and demands as far as possible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?