Meta Analysis of Dynamic or Static External Fixation for Distal Radius Fracture

王杰,马信龙,马剑雄,徐卫国,邢丹,杨阳,朱少文,马宝意,陈阳
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2014.12.006
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of dynamic and static external fixation of distal radius fracture.Methods MEDLINE (1966.01-2012.12) and Cochrane Library (Issue 4,2012) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) describing dynamic versus static external fixation of distal radius fracture.Two reviewers independently screened the studies,extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality.Meta analysis of the data was performed with RevMan 5.0 software.Results Seven RCTs were included.In comparison with static external fixation,dynamic external fixation was superior in wrist pronation (MD =0.25,95% CI 0.08-4.92,P < 0.05),radial length (MD =1.50,95%CI0.75-2.26,P<0.01) and volartilt (MD=4.31,95%CI2.13-6.49,P<0.01) at one year follow-up period.No between-group difference was observed with regard to upper extremity functional score,grip strength of the injured side,movement of the injured wrist except for pronation,infection rate and incidence of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD).Conclusion Either dynamic or static external fixation is effective in treatment of distal radius fracture,but the dynamic external fixation can provide better radiographic anatomical alignment at one year follow-up period.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?