Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

Rethinking the Procedural Sanction Theory:Focusing on the Exclusionary Rule

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Procedural Sanction System

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

On Procedural Defense

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

Caution on Excessive Pursuit of the Efficiency of Criminal Procedure

Frontiers of the Civil Procedural Law Theory

A Preliminary Research on Failure of Criminal Procedure

Criminal Methodology and Judicial Logic

Neoproceduralism and Its Discontents in China

To Provide for New Rights or To Strengthen Remedies?

Several Choices in the Re - revising of Criminal Procedural Law

Chinese Mode of Illegal Evidences' Exclusion

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

On the Protection of Procedural Interests

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years