Weekly versus Three Weekly Regimens of Taxanes for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer:A Systematic Review

SHAO Yi,MA Li,MA Bin,TIAN Jin-Hui,YANG Ke-Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2010.05.019
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine the effectiveness and safety of weekly versus three weekly regimens of taxanes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1,2008),PubMed (1966 to May 2008),EMbase (1974 to May 2008),and CBM (1978 to May 2008) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared weekly and three weekly regimens of taxanes for NSCLC. Data collection was undertaken by two reviewers independently; the methodological quality was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook 4.2.6; and the meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Nine RCTs involving 1 438 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed:(1) There were no significant differences in the effi cacy between weekly and three weekly regimens of taxanes regarding the one-year survival rate (paclitaxel:RR=1.24,95%CI 0.83 to 1.86; docetaxel:RR=0.80,95%CI 0.51 to 1.23) and the overall response rate (paclitaxel:RR=1.03,95%CI 0.72 to 1.49; docetaxel:RR=0.98 95%CI 0.64 to 1.49). (2) The incidence of neutropenia was less serious in the weekly group (paclitaxel:RR=0.74,95%CI 0.56 to 0.97; docetaxel:RR=0.22,95%CI 0.16 to 0.30),while no significant differences existed in other adverse effects such as anemia and nausea/vomiting. Conclusion The eff icacy of weekly and three weekly regimens of taxanes for the treatment of NSCLC is similar. The incidence of neutropenia is lower in the weekly group while other toxicities show no differences.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?