Comparison of the Curative Effects of Pemetrexed and Docetaxel in Patients with Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer

CHEN Mo,ZHOU Cai-cun,ZHANG Jie
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of Pemetrexed versus Docetaxel for chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) who had a performance status(ECOG PS)2.Methods Sixty-seven patients with NSCLC were randomly assigned to two groups: 35 patients received single-agent Pemetrexed(ALIMTA) 500 mg/m2 and 32 patients received Docetaxel(AISU) 75 mg/m2.Results Sixty-two of 67 patients were evaluable for efficacy.Overall response rates were 6.25% and 6.67%(P=0.871) for Pemetrexed and Docetaxel respectively.The median time to disease progression(TPP) were 5.2 months vs 5.5 months(P=0.086) for Pemetrexed and Docetaxel respectively.The median survival time was 8.1 months vs 7.7 months(P=0.071) for Pemetrexed and Docetaxel respectively.The 1-year survival rate for Pemetrexed and Docetaxel were 34.5% vs 32.7%(P=0.614) respectively.The principal toxicities were myelosuppression,nausea/vomiting,fatigue and rash.Patients receiving Docetaxel were more likely to have grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ neutropenia(6.25% vs 43.3%,P0.001);febrile neutropenia in Pemetrexed group was significantly lower than Docetaxel group(3.13% vs 13.3%,P0.001).Conclusion Treatment with Pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes,but with significantly fewer side effects compared with Docetaxel in the first-line treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small-cell lung(NSCLC) who had a performance status 2 and should be recommended.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?