Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Intravenous Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Have Failed at Least Two Prior Systemic Treatments

Jianchun Duan,Yueqin Hao,Rui Wan,Sifan Yu,Hua Bai,Tongtong An,Jun Zhao,Zhijie Wang,Minglei Zhuo,Jie Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12413
IF: 3.223
2017-01-01
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:BackgroundThe study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly intravenous nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (NAB-paclitaxel) treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone multi-line therapy, and to investigate the association of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression status with clinical outcome.MethodsSixty-four patients who received NAB-paclitaxel treatment (130mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle) as third line or further systemic treatment from 1 May 2011 to 30 June 2014 were included in this retrospective analysis. Tumor tissue was available in 28 patients for analysis of SPARC expression by immunohistochemistry.ResultsSixty-two patients had response evaluation and complete survival follow-up data; 83.9% received the weekly NAB-paclitaxel as fourth-line treatment or beyond. The objective response and disease control rates (n=62) were 16.1% (10/62) and 64.5% (40/62), respectively. The median progression-free and overall survival rates were 3.7 (95% confidence interval 2.6-4.8) and 9.8months (95% confidence interval 6.9-12.8), respectively. Previous treatment with taxane did not affect the response to NAB-paclitaxel. The main grade 3-4 toxicities experienced were neutropenia (9.4%) and leukopenia (7.8%). Patients with SPARC expression in tumor stroma but not in cancer cells had poorer progression-free survival compared with those with negative SPARC expression in tumor stroma cells (3.3 vs. 5.0months, P=0.036).ConclusionWeekly NAB-paclitaxel might be effective for heavily pretreated NSCLC patients. SPARC expression in tumor stroma cells might be a potential negative predictor of NAB-paclitaxel.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?