Weekly Paclitaxel Improved Pathological Response of Primary Chemotherapy Compared with Standard 3 Weeks Schedule

T. Ouyang,J. Li,Y. Xie,A. Lu,B. Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-5109
IF: 11.2
2009-01-01
Cancer Research
Abstract:Abstract Abstract #5109 Background: Weekly paclitaxel is superior to every-3-wk schedule in the management of MBC. This single institute, prospective randomized trial was designed to compare the efficacy of the weekly paclitaxel to every-3-wk schedule in terms of pathological response. Material and methods: Histologically confirmed T1-3 N0-1M0 invasive breast cancer pts planed to receive adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. After the completion of 2 cycles of CTFci ( CTX 500mg/m2 d1/d8, pirarubicin 35 mg/m2 d1/d8, 5-Fu 200 mg/m2.day.ci d1-28, every 4 weeks) primary chemotherapy, pts were randomized to received 4 cycles of PTq3w (arm A: carboplatin AUC 6mg/ml.min day1, paclitaxel 175mg/m2 day1, every 3 weeks) or PTq1w (arm B: carboplatin AUC 6mg/ml.min day1, paclitaxel 60mg/m2 day1/8/15, every 3 weeks) before surgery, stratified by clinical response to 2 cycles of CTFci. Status of axillary node were determined by sentinel node biopsy or ultrasound guided FNA (if abnormal ultrasonographically) before primary chemotherapy. Pathological response of the primary tumor was evaluated by using Miller and Payne system, clinical response was determined by ultrasonography. Results: From 05/2005 to 10/2007, 220 pts ( 196 were planed) under 65yr entered in this trial. 201 pts completed planed treatment and 12 pts(arm A 4 pts, arm B 8 pts)choice to have surgery after 2 cycles of paclitaxel treatment, other 7 pts (5 protocol violation, 1 without surgery, 1 treated in other hospital) were excluded for analysis. Clinical tumor status, node status, estrogen receptor expression, Her-2 expression and clinical response to CTFci were no different between two arms. Arm A resulted more G1/G2(loss of tumor cells less than 30%) and less G5/G4 ( loss of tumor cells more than 90%) than arm B (28.70% vs. 14.28% p=0.011, 44.44% vs. 58.10% p= 0.047 ). The pCR rate of positive node were 39.29%(11/28) in arm A and 54.17%(13/24) in arm B ( p=0.283). There were 17(15.74%) pts in arm A and 67(61.81%)pts in arm B experienced treatment delay caused by neutropenia(G3), thrombocytopenia(G2), anemia(G2) or hepatotoxicity(G2). There was no treatment related death. Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel was well tolerant and more effective than 3 week schedule. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5109.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?