The Conflict-Handling Modes:A Review of Multi-Dimensional Models and Assessment of Classic Measuring Instruments
Bao Gongmin,Zhao Zhuojia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2008.04.016
2008-01-01
Abstract:As an inevitable phenomenon of daily life in organizations,conflicts always exert variable effects on work groups and their members.Either functional or dysfunctional outcomes are attributed to the content and intensity of a conflict,and the way to deal with them is also important.A wise and reasonable choice of the The conflict strategies will directly influence not only the relationship between group members,but also their output and performance to some extent.The conflict-handling-mode is a multi-dimensional concept. Nowadays,two-dimensional models are the mainstream,which generally categories conflict-managing methods into five ones—competing,collaboration,compromising,avoiding and obliging.According to the theoretical models,there are five classic scales—CMS,MODE,OCCI,CMMS,ROCI-Ⅱ—and all of them are empirically validated and supported to varying degrees.Comparing the item content and psychometric properties of each scale,we can find both advantages and disadvantages in them,especially some common and noticeable shortcomings,such as low reliabilities,simple validations and significant social desirability bias.Therefore,based on the maturity of theoretic models,further amendment and refining are needed for these instruments in the future.