A Review on James R. Martin’s Discourse Studies

CHEN Yumin,HUANG Guowen

2010-01-01

Abstract:This paper provides a review on James R.Martin’s major studies in the field ofdiscourse analysis over the last three decades,covering the research on genre,interpersonal meaning,and multimodal discourse analysis.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

James R. Martin’s Perspective on Discourse Semantics

WANG Zhenhua,ZHANG Daqun,ZHANG Xiangang

2010-01-01

Abstract:James R.Martin’s achievements in discourse semantics have won considerable attention.In this paper,we select 14 seminal discourse semantics papers published from 1977 through 2008.These papers mainly concern reference,conjunction,theme and periodicity,and appraisal systems.We review the papers and sum up his main contributions to discourse semantics,concluding that Martin’s contribution to the discipline is unparalleled in the SFL world,especially his achievements in the study of systems of meaning beyond the clause.
James R. Martin’s Studies on Genre

ZHANG Delu

2010-01-01

Abstract:The article mainly gives a brief survey of and comment on the study of genre by James R.Martin.First,it presents the history and the present state of the art in genre study,and then,it briefly introduces Martin’s own studies on genre and his achievements in genre study.Finally,it shows the motivation and the three stages of Martin’s genre study.The motivation is summarized as "one source and two motives".The one source is the influence and effect of Micheal Gregory’s contextual theory on him in his undergraduate and graduate study in Canada,and his own understanding and knowledge of language and context.The two motives are the theoretical motive,i.e,developing systemic functional linguistics,and the practical motive,perfecting writing teaching.His three stages of genre study are preliminary understanding,modelization of genre,and in-depth study.
Martin on Discourse Semantics, Genre, Educational Linguistics

James R. Martin,Yanmei Gao,Hanbing Li,Chengfang Song,Minglong Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.20003.mar

2021-01-01

Language, Context and Text

Abstract:J.R. Martin is a leading scholar who has greatly developed the theoretical framework of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) over the past four decades. Some of these contributions, such as the systems of discourse semantics, the appraisal framework and genre relations have been widely applied in various areas of linguistic studies and language education. The educational linguistic model he and his colleagues have cultivated and developed has attracted the attention of more and more educators from different disciplines around the globe. In this interview, he firstly elaborates on the significance of the concepts of discourse semantics, grammatical metaphor and genre. Then he continues with applications of genre theory in secondary school education, language maintenance, the relation and collaboration between Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) and SFL, and how the two paradigms complement each other. Finally, he introduces some of his recent collaborations with grammarians of different languages.
A Review of Introduction to Discourse Studies

Ling JIANG,Dong-ming YU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-44502005000100008

2011-01-01

Abstract:Introduction to Discourse Studies aims to introduce and generalize the fundamental concepts,key questions and major approaches in discourse studies following the Anglo-American and the European theoretical traditions.It also tries to explore the levels,structures and meanings of discourse from both the micro linguistic context and the macro socio-cultural context.The book stands out as a substantially important textbook in discourse studies with its comprehensive content,rich material and its attention to the interdisciplinary nature and new trends in discourse studies.
James R. Martin’s Development and Application of Register Theory

YANG Xinzhang

2010-01-01

Abstract:As a systemicist,James R.Martin has done a great deal of research in the field of register,and attracted wide attention.He regards register as a semiotic system,and context as a semiotic system and a system of social process.To him,field is the most important variable of register,and the relationship between register and genre is one of stratification.Register realizes genre.This paper attempts to comment on Martin’s thinking on register,his analysis of different registers,his studies of register development and literacy,and his contributions to the development of register theory.Martin widens the scope of register and develops theories of genre and appraisal.He attaches great importance to the study of literacy and register development from the systemic perspective.
Book Review: Sumin Zhao, Emilia Djonov, Anders Björkvall and Morten Boeriis (eds), Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics

Shuai Liu,Jingyuan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619871365e

IF: 1.8

2019-01-01

Discourse Studies

Abstract:Finally, the book can be recommended to readers of discourse studies because it bridges the disciplinary gap between linguistics and media studies. It further constitutes an informative resource book for students and scholars who are keen on studying language in use across media. Even within the discipline of linguistics, the book provides valuable insights for understanding the continuum and spectrum of the topics of the contributions across different media contexts.
James R. Martin’s Framework of Genre-based Writing:A Systemic-Functional Linguistic Perspective

MA Yulei

2010-01-01

Abstract:This paper introduces James R.Martin’s Genre-based literacy pedagogy theory,which is a part of SFL’s model of language and social context where genre is defined as a staged,goal-oriented social process.Martin’s genre-based literacy pedagogy is manifested in class by four parts:Negotiating the Field,Deconstruction,Joint-construction and Indepedent Construction.This teaching scaffold emphasizes the interaction between teacher and students in class,and their knowledge about genre and genre relations.Adopting a top-down model which is quite subversive,this teaching scaffold is quite different from that of the traditional and contrast to that of the progressive pedagogy.Knowledge about language in literacy pedagogy is emphasized,too.We believe that this teaching pedagogy can be conducive to the current college English teaching in China.
Book Review: Rodney Jones,Spoken Discourse

Yansheng Mao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734348b

IF: 1.8

2018-01-01

Discourse Studies

Abstract:modes. The type of analytical tools multimodal CDS employs depends on the specific research question and the forms of data to be investigated. The chapter focuses on methods for the analysis of the verbal and the visual modes of communication. In the final chapter, KhosraviNik and Unger discuss the critical discourse analysis of social media. While CDS traditionally analyses texts after they are produced, CDS approaches to social media view and analyse texts within their interactive context, attending to communicative events rather than communicative data themselves. Their methodology has an interdisciplinary focus that incorporates insights from media and technology theories. The main strength of this book is that it offers a thorough and accessible introduction to the most prominent theories, methods and areas of application in the ever-growing field of CDS. Readers of the previous editions will find in this book a more developed agenda for CDS, expanded discussions of new topics and up-to-date examples. New readers, especially beginners, will gain from this clearly written book a solid understanding of the major approaches to CDS, their applications and how analysis works. The book is undoubtedly an essential read and a valuable sourcebook for scholars and students interested in the interplay among discourse, ideology and power. The added didactic features also make this new version an ideal text for teaching critical discourse analysis.
Review of Martin, Maton & Doran (2020): Accessing academic discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory

Hui Zou,Chenguang Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00047.zou

2022-11-19

Functions of Language

Abstract:This article reviews Accessing academic discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory 97803672360769780429280726

linguistics
A Literature Review of Organizational Discourse and Prospects

Zhang Huiyu,Yang Jun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2016.07.004

2016-01-01

Abstract:Organizational discourse studies essentially regard the organizations as discourse-based social construction process,and analyze organizational behavior,phenomena,relationships, elements and even the organizations themselves by directly exploring verbal and written discourse texts in organizational context. The special theoretical framework and research method take the “linguistic turn” in social sciences as the development opportunity,challenge the tradition of empiricism, rethink the relationship between language and reality,have reform significance to organization research,and have been extensively used in such organization research fields as institution,strategy, identity and change. Based on a systematic review of major findings in the four critical areas,this paper sums up main contributions of discourse analysis to organization research,and then proposes theoretical model of discourse construction process of organizations and their elements. It points out main problems in current research and future research directions from perspectives of language attention degree,theoretical basis,research method and research topics,and especially makes basic suggestions about the construction of Chinese organizational discourse system and related studies,to introduce organizational discourse studies into Chinese organizational management field,and pave ways for future related studies,especially organizational discourse in Chinese context.
A Review of Critical Discourse Analysis Studies in China

Jun Chen,Lei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/LLS.2016.040605

2016-11-01

Abstract:The paper provides a review of critical discourse analysis (CDA) studies in China from the 1990s. It starts with the origin, definition, and research scope of CDA in America and Europe. Although Chinese scholars began to show interest in CDA studies in 1995, about two decades later than their western counterparts, they have made considerable achievements in the field. On the review research level, quite a few independent studies indicate that CDA studies are attracting increasing attention from the field of linguistics, media studies, politics, and philosophy; theoretical and methodological research reveals that Chinese scholars are endeavoring to yield original research results on the basis of CDA studies abroad; practical research shows that CDA has been applied to the investigation of various discourses to disclose social reality, especially the inter-relationship between discourse, power and ideology.

Sociology
Theoretical and Empirical Studies on Meta-discourse: A Review

XU Hai-ming,PAN Hai-yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2005.06.005

2005-01-01

Abstract:Previous theoretical and empirical studies on meta-discourse are reviewed in detail in this paper. First, the definitions, functions and classifications of meta-discourse are scrutinized; then salient differing theoretical approaches to meta-discourse are described. Major empirical studies on the use of meta-discourse markers are also examined critically. The paper suggests that future research with a longitudinal methodology stands in dire need and that how Chinese learners of English learn meta-discourse markers and how to construct a theoretical framework to interpret the factors that affect their use of meta-discourse markers remain an imperative in the field.
Frederic Jameson's "Marxism Literary Critic"

Fan Fangjun

2010-01-01

Abstract:In the academic circle in China,the name of Frederic Jameson is always related to "Marxism critic","cultural critic",and "post-modernism theorist".The author of this article,on the other hand,through scrutinizing Jameson's works,takes Jameson as a literary critic.This article suggests that literary criticism has always been an indispensable part in Jameson's critic theory and practice,although Jameson's research covers many fields such as literary criticism,cultural study,post-modernism and so on.This article explains the status and role of literary criticism in Jameson's critic theory and practice,and points out that Jameson's literary criticism theory and practice may shed some new light on the current study of Chinese culture.
Book Review: Sara Mills, Gender Matters: Feminist Linguistic Analysis

Xinzhang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613503228g

IF: 1.8

2013-01-01

Discourse Studies

Abstract:the data from asynchronous peer-to-peer discussions. The study shows the argumentative functions of narratives, such as supporting assessments and advice or for relational work. Section 4 is devoted to structures in interaction. Sivenkova investigates a variety of communicative moves in which interlocutors negotiate appropriateness of an utterance. Speyer discusses the filling of the sentence-initial position in German in terms of discourse-structural considerations. Smith’s focus is on ‘phatic expression’ within the theoretical framework of ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and speech act theory by analysing the data from everyday telephone conversations in German and French. The 14 chapters are revised versions of presentations given at the Organization in Discourse 3: The Interactional Perspective conference held in Turku in August 2006. The conference and the 14 chapters are unique in that they analyse a great variety of types of interaction. As the editors point out (p. 7), although the starting point, goals and aims of studies differ, the volume is significant in adopting a new understanding of discourse, which will help to challenge old beliefs and to motivate new understanding to emerge. Through the interactional approaches to discourse in the 14 chapters, readers can easily see ‘the interconnected, parallel, but also varying and even divergent discourses on interaction’ (p. 7). The most salient feature of this volume, I think, is that it presents readers with divergent research approaches and various types of data, such as courtroom interaction, media discourse, trials and telephone conversations. In so doing, it will benefit readers with different academic backgrounds. There are multiple reasons why the book can be recommended to a range of readers. It can not only serve as a course and reference book for students and researchers interested in the subject of discourse analysis, but also set the scene for further studies on interactional discourse linguistics.
Book Review: David Machin, Analysing Popular Music: Image, Sound, Text

Haicui Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486580b

IF: 1.8

2014-01-01

Discourse Studies

Abstract:‘as’ structure in citations, and how these choices reveal the writers’ evaluation of their sources. In Chapter 11, Ramona Tang further reaffirms her critique of the negative way in which ESL/EFL participation in academic discourses is mostly framed. Tang presents us with personal and professional narratives from several NNS academics, and – based on their experiences as well as her own – argues for a more positive framing of the discussion about ESL/EFL speaker discourses and a better recognition of ESL/EFL scholars’ potential to contribute to their disciplinary communities. This remarkable book sheds interesting light on the complex realities experienced by many ESL/EFL students and scholars, who live and write in English in such geographically and institutionally diverse countries as Australia, China, Japan, Italy and Poland. I highly recommend it to anyone interested in NNS written discourse, wishing to understand these complexities better. As a teacher of academic writing and a non-native speaker of English, I often grapple with language problems in texts written by my students or by myself – and, in this respect, I personally find many of its chapters pedagogically useful. But – above all – this book has deepened my understanding of ‘writing as social practice’ (p. 246) and has raised my awareness of the complex social and cultural issues involved in writing in academia across the world.
Book Review: ELENA SEMINO, Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 247 Pp., ISBN 978521867306 (Hbk)

Xu Ci-hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456090110060603

IF: 1.8

2009-01-01

Discourse Studies

Abstract:genre is structured, going beyond the textual information. Such an approach to genre is, in my view, essential, precisely for the fact that the very concept of genres is disrupting, for instance, in the sense that ‘[t]hey offend modernity, which prefers to hide its genericity beneath its creed of individualism’ (Martin and Rose, 2008: 258). Even though Wang’s work, due to its complexity, is aimed at a very limited public – researchers and scholars – as well as considering that it would have been enriched had the author discussed some pedagogical implications, for instance, for the teaching of writing, it should undoubtedly be welcomed as a solid contribution to the field of genre studies, especially for those who also view the sociocultural features and specific contextual information as indispensable elements for the analysis of language in use.
A Review on the Communication Studies in China in 2006

LI Bin,CAO Shule

2007-01-01

Journal of International Communication

Abstract:This article analyzes the papers about the communication studies in the five major domestic academic journals in 2006,and gives a summary on the aspects of theories and intellectual history,basic concepts and methodology.
Researches on Jameson's Postmodern Culture Criticism

Chen Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4310.2007.02.005

2007-01-01

Abstract:It is analyzed in this article that Jameson's postmodern culture criticism is contradiction with the characteristic of the postmodern culture.It is because that he want to piece together many kinds of means to criticize postmodern culture phenomenon.The characteristic and the colors of postmodern is appeared in his criticism theory.
A Review on the Studies of Journalism and Communication in China in 2006

CHEN Lidan,WANG Lu

2007-01-01

Journal of International Communication

Abstract:According to the academic journals in 2006,this article summarizes the studies of Journalism and communication in china from such aspects as media forms,journalism theories,communication studies,internet communication,journalism history,and broadcasting.
A Review of Journalism and Communication Studies in Mainland China,2009

CHEN Lidan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2010.01.004

2010-01-01

Journal of International Communication

Abstract:This article outlines Journalism and Communication Studies in Mainland China,2009.These studies are divided into three categories:information theory,journalism history and communication theory.According to the article, although social group events and online hot topics are frequent,academic studies are relatively cool,except for various analysis of current issues.

A Review on James R. Martin’s Discourse Studies

James R. Martin’s Perspective on Discourse Semantics

James R. Martin’s Studies on Genre

Martin on Discourse Semantics, Genre, Educational Linguistics

A Review of Introduction to Discourse Studies

James R. Martin’s Development and Application of Register Theory

Book Review: Sumin Zhao, Emilia Djonov, Anders Björkvall and Morten Boeriis (eds), Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics

James R. Martin’s Framework of Genre-based Writing:A Systemic-Functional Linguistic Perspective

Book Review: Rodney Jones,Spoken Discourse

Review of Martin, Maton & Doran (2020): Accessing academic discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory

A Literature Review of Organizational Discourse and Prospects

A Review of Critical Discourse Analysis Studies in China

Theoretical and Empirical Studies on Meta-discourse: A Review

Frederic Jameson's "Marxism Literary Critic"

Book Review: Sara Mills, Gender Matters: Feminist Linguistic Analysis

Book Review: David Machin, Analysing Popular Music: Image, Sound, Text

Book Review: ELENA SEMINO, Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 247 Pp., ISBN 978521867306 (Hbk)

A Review on the Communication Studies in China in 2006

Researches on Jameson's Postmodern Culture Criticism

A Review on the Studies of Journalism and Communication in China in 2006

A Review of Journalism and Communication Studies in Mainland China,2009