Logic of Governance of Administrative Law
Luo Haocai,Song Gongde
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6676.2011.15.029
2011-01-01
Abstract:The model of administrative law conforming to Managerialism risks distorting administrative law’s logic and weakening its legitimacy,since it tends to over-exaggerate the tensions between public and private interests,and to over-emphasize the priority of administration - focusing exclusively on the order-obey aspect of the administrative actions and values.The emerging public governance model rather bases obedience to administrative law on identification.The article puts forward the following four suggestions.First to reevaluate the formation mechanism of administrative law,in order to solve the failure of private choice through public reason,meanwhile to reshape the interest bases of administrative law regards to all aspects of administration,including expropriation,benefits,policing and cooperation;Second,to "restore" the administrative law and formulate the roles of the administrative law,according to the aforementioned revamped administrative law’s formation mechanism;Third,based on the cognitive and constructive perspectives,from administrative action to reciprocal administrative relations,to set an administrative control/citizen autonomy model following the principle of proportionality ;Fourth,to establish a discourse framework regards to administrative law subjects,and to seek universal identification with administrative law validity based on a 360° discourse model.The article holds that a model of administrative law conforming to this logic of governance will present asymmetrical balance,in which the legal status of agencies and individuals is equal.