Abstract:Background, aims and scope: Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] cannot react with either carbonate or hydroxide to form chromium precipitates. However, by using a precipitation technology to treat plating wastewater containing Cr(VI), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II), approximately 78% of Cr(VI) (initial 60 mg/L) was co-removed with the precipitation of Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) (each 150 mg/L) by dosing with Na2CO3 (Sun 2003). Direct precipitation by forming Cu(II)-Cr(VI) precipitates followed by adsorption of Cr(VI) onto freshly formed Cu-precipitates was subsequently found to be the main mechanism(s) involved in Cr(VI) co-removal with Cu(II) precipitation by dosing Na2CO3 stepwise to various pH values (Sun et al. 2003). This study was. carried out to further characterize the formation of primary precipitates during the early stages of copper precipitation and simultaneous removal of Cr(VI) with Cu(II). Methods: Test metal-solutions were prepared with industrial grade chemicals: CuCl2 x 2H2O, Na2SO4 and K2Cr2207. NaCO3 was added drop-wise to synthetic metal-solution to progressively increase pH. For each pH increment, removal of soluble metals was detected by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) and surface morphology of precipitates was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). To further characterize the formation of primary precipitates, a series of MINEQL+ thermodynamic calculations/analyses and equilibrium calculations/ analyses were conducted. Results and discussion: MINEQL+ thermodynamic calculation indicated that, for a system containing 150 mg/L Cu(II) and 60 mg/L Cr(VI) with gradual Na2CO3 dosing, if any precipitates can be formed at pH 5.0 or lower, it should be in the form of CuCrO4. Comparison tests using systems containing the same equivalent of Cu(II) plus Cr(VI) and Cu(II) plus SO4(2-) showed that the precipitation occurred at a pH of around 5.0 in the Cu(II)-Cr(VI) system and around 6.0 in the Cu(II)-SO4(2-) system. The discrepancy of the precipitation was indeed caused by the formation of Cu-Cr precipitates. The initiation of copper removal at pH around 5.0 for the Cu-Cr co-removal test was not attributable to the formation of Cu-CO3 precipitates, instead, it was most likely through the formation of insoluble Cu-Cr precipitates, such as CuCrO4 and CuCrO4 x 2Cu(OH)2. Experimental tests, equilibrium calculations, MINEQL+ thermodynamic calculations and surface morphologies for systems using higher concentrations of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) further verified the most probable composition of primary precipitates is copper-chromate. Conclusion: In the Cu-Cr co-removal test with Na2O3 dosing to increase pH and induce metal precipitation, copper-chromate precipitates are the primary precipitates produced and contribute to the initial simultaneous removal of copper and chromium.

A Preliminary Study on the Cr(IV) Removing from Wastewater by Precipitation of Jarosite Group Minerals

Treatment of hexavalent chromium-containing electroplating wastewater by barium salt precipitation

Efficient resource treatment of hexavalent chromium wastewater based on lead carbonate (cerussite)-induced precipitation separation

An Insight into Properties and Mechanisms of a Dithiocarbamate Chelating Agent for the Removal of Toxic Metal Ions from Metallic Mine Wastewater

Removal Of Cr(Vi) And Cr(Iii) From Aqueous Solutions And Industrial Wastewaters By Natural Clino-Pyrrhotite

Removal of Chromium from CrEDTA Synthetic Wastewater Using Advanced Fenton-Hydroxide Precipitation Process

Study on the Application of Heavy Metal Chelating Agent in Wastewater Treatment

An investigation on reuse of Cr-contaminated sediment: Cr removal and interaction between Cr and organic matter

Experimental Study on Treatment of High-Concentrated Sulfur Wastewater by Process of Depositing Natrojarosite and Its Environmental Significance

Characterization of primary precipitate composition formed during co-removal of Cr(VI) with Cu(II) in synthetic wastewater

Removing Heavy Metal Chromium(III) of the Water by 13X Molecular Sieve

One-step Disposal of Cr (Vi)-Bearing Wastewater by Natural Pyrrhotite

Methods for Treating Strong Chelate-Containing Wastewater PartⅡ——Chelation/precipitation Process for the Treatment of Mixed Electroplating Wastewater

Comparison of hexavalent chromium and cadmium removal from wastewater in constructed rapid infiltration system with layered double hydroxides (LDHs) modified maifanite substrates: Physical, chemical and microbial mechanism

Different Insights into Silicate Rectorite Modification and Its Role in Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater

Hexavalent Chromium Removal from Solutions: Surface Efficacy and Characterizations of Three Iron Containing Minerals

Super-stable Mineralization of Multiple Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater for Utilization in Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction and Trace Precious Metal Recovery

Enhanced sequestration of chelated Cr(III) from aqueous by Al-containing ferrihydrite: New expectation of overall removal of various heavy metal complexes

Amine-functionalized cellulose nanofiber-sodium alginate-Fe(III) porous hollow beads for the efficient removal of Cr(VI)

Highly efficient Cr(VI) removal from industrial electroplating wastewater over Bi2S3 nanostructures prepared by dual sulfur-precursors: Insights on the promotion effect of sulfate ions

Effect of Alkaline Precipitation on Cr Species of Cr(III)-bearing Complexes Typically Used in the Tannery Industry.