The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain
Chen Kun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.2007.09.007
2007-01-01
Abstract:The logical positivists has failed on the problems of language, objectivity and line dividing, so they do not have sufficient reasons to remove the value problem outside the ration range according to the dichotomy of fact and value. They deny any kind of possibility of rational discussion in the value domain, and try to deprive our rights to critically reconsider our social order and our political and law system. On the other hand, value objectivists, lead us to the superstition to the determinacy, when they understand value problem coming the way according to objective science. We must acknowledge that there is some kind of possibility of rational discussion in the value domain, when it is talked about, the ration it needs is unable to achieve and absolutely grasps the finally understanding of the world and the life, but can complete its historical mission. Thus, the appropriate manner to treat value question must be one kind of "the moral realism", this kind of theory acknowledges that we can carry on the rational defense to the moral question, but denies any kind of morals system or value set.